Brussels will pay for everything. The shaping of the European public sphere before NextGenerationEU

  1. Rivas-de-Roca, Rubén 1
  2. García-Gordillo, Mar 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Zeitschrift:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Titel der Ausgabe: Crisis en el espacio público

Ausgabe: 31

Nummer: 3

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2022.MAY.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: El profesional de la información

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

The Covid-19 pandemic meant challenges in crisis management for democratic institutions such as the European Union (EU). To achieve an economic and social recovery to the crisis, the EU institutions have promoted the NextGenerationEU (NGEU) program, a massive recovery package for this purpose. This action takes place at a time of strong visibility of Euroscepticism within a global phenomenon of distrust in political authorities. The present work aims to know the shaping of the European Public Sphere when NGEU is launched. First, the evolution of EU support during the pandemic is described, analyzing the possible factors that influence on this variable. On this matter, a secondary analysis of data is applied on different waves of the Eurobarometer (EB 92, 93, 94 and 95). The statistical method is also used to give items that determine the image of the EU. Moreover, the communicative dissemination of this plan is drawing upon semi-structured interviews with some of the professionals who deal with the task. The objective is to provide an overview of how the public sphere made up of citizens and institutions is defined before a moment of symbolic relevance. The results reveal a trend towards greater positivity with the EU after the pandemic. However, among other possible factors, the degree of support depends on the ideological position and, to a lesser extent, on the type of community where the citizens live. EU officials assess this rise of Europeanism as an opportunity, targeting the NGEU communication campaign especially at young people.

€ Finanzierung ansehen

Informationen zur Finanzierung

El autor Rubén Rivas-de-Roca ha sido beneficiario de un contrato predoctoral PIF, en el marco del VI Plan Propio de Investigación y Transferencia de la Universidad de Sevilla (VI PPIT-US).

Geldgeber

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Alonso-Muñoz, Laura (2020). “The ‘more is more’ effect: a comparative analysis of the political agenda and the strategy on Twitter of the European populist parties”. European politics and society, v. 21, n. 5, pp. 505-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1672921
  • Andrino-San-Cristóbal, Sonia (2014). Comunicar sobre Europa, desde Europa y para Europa. La política de comunicación europea entre 1990 y 2010: Euranet, la primera red de radios europeas. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid. Secretariado de Publicaciones. ISBN: 978 84 84488118
  • Ares, Cristina; Bouza, Luis (2019). Política de la Unión Europea: crisis y continuidad. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. ISBN: 978 84 74767957
  • Bennett, W. Lance; Pfetsch, Barbara (2018). “Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres”. Journal of communication, v. 68, n. 2, pp. 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
  • Bimber, Bruce; Gil de Zúñiga, Homero (2020). “The unedited public sphere”. New media & society, v. 22, n. 4, pp. 700-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980
  • Boomgaarden, Hajo G.; De-Vreese, Claes H. (2016). “Do European elections create a European public sphere?”. In: Van-der-Brug, Wouter; De-Vreese, Claes H. (eds.). (Un)Intended consequences of European parliamentary elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19-35. ISBN: 978 0 198757412 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757412.003.0002
  • Bossetta, Michael; Segesten, Anamaria-Dutceac; Trenz, Hans-Jörg (2017). “Engaging with European politics through Twitter and Facebook: Participation beyond the national?”. In: Barisione, Mauro; Michailidou, Asimina (eds.). Social media and European politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 53-76. ISBN: 978 1 137598899 https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5
  • Bouza-García, Luis; Tuñón-Navarro, Jorge (2018). “Personalización, distribución, impacto y recepción en Twitter del discurso de Macron ante el Parlamento Europeo el 17/04/18”. Profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 6, pp. 1239-1247. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.07
  • Braun, Daniela; Schäfer, Constantin (2021). “Issues that mobilize Europe. The role of key policy issues for voter turnout in the 2019 European Parliament election”. European union politics, v. 23, n. 1, pp. 120-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165211040337
  • Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Victoria (2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative research in psychology, v. 3, n. 2, pp. 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Brosius, Anna; Van-Elsas, Erika; De-Vreese, Claes H. (2019). “Trust in the European Union: Effects of the information environment”. European journal of communication, v. 34, n. 1, pp. 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118810843
  • Bruns, Axel; Enli, Gunn; Skogerbö, Eli; Larsson, Anders; Christensen, Christian (eds.) (2016). Routledge companion to social media and politics. New York: Routledge. ISBN: 978 1 13886076X
  • Caiani, Manuela; Guerra, Simona (2017). Euroscepticism, democracy and the media: Communicating Europe, contesting Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978 1 137596420 https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59643-7
  • Casero-Ripollés, Andreu (2017). “Producing political content for web 2.0: Empowering citizens and vulnerable populations”. El profesional de la información, v. 26, n. 1, pp. 13-19. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.ene.02
  • Casero-Ripollés, Andreu (2020). “Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 2, e290223. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23
  • Codogno, Lorenzo; Van-den-Noord, Paul (2020). “Assessing NextGenerationEU”. LSE European politics and policy (Europp) blog, Ocober 7. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/107284
  • Crilley, Rhys; Gillespie, Marie (2019). “What to do about social media? Politics, populism and journalism”. Journalism, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 173-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807344
  • De-Vries, Catherine (2018). Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0198793380
  • De-Wilde, Pieter; Laupold, Anna; Schmidtke, Henning (2016). “Introduction: the differentiated politicisation of European governance”. West European politics, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505
  • Fletcher, Richard; Cornia, Alessio; Nielsen, Rasmus-Kleis (2020). “How polarized are online and offline news audiences? A comparative analysis of twelve countries”. The international journal of press/politics, v. 25, n. 2, pp. 169-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219892768
  • García-Marín, David (2020). “Infodemia global. Desórdenes informativos, narrativas fake y fact-checking en la crisis de la Covid-19”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 4, e290411. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.11
  • Gattermann, Katjana; De-Vreese, Claes H. (2020). “Awareness of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2019 European elections: The effects of news exposure in domestic campaign contexts”. Research & politics, v. 7, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020915332
  • Goldberg, Andreas C.; Brosius, Anna; De-Vreese, Claes H. (2021). “Policy responsibility in the multilevel EU structure - The (non-)effect of media reporting on citizens’ responsibility attribution across four policy areas”. Journal of European integration. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1863959
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity. ISBN: 978 0 745602745
  • Hancu-Budui, Andreea; Zorio-Grima, Ana; Blanco-Vega, José (2020). “Audit institutions in the European Union: Public service promotion, environmental engagement and Covid crisis communication through social media”. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 23, 9816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239816
  • Hänska, Max; Bauchowitz, Stefan (2019). “Can social media facilitate a European public sphere? Transnational communication and the Europeanization of Twitter during the Eurozone crisis”. Social media + society, v. 5, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119854686
  • Hennen, Leonhard (2020). “E-Democracy and the European public sphere”. In: Hennen, Leonhard; Van-Keulen, Ira; Korthagen, Iris; Aichholzer, George; Lindner, Ralf; Nielsen, Rasmus Øjvind (eds.). European E-democracy in practice. Cham: Springer, pp. 47-91. ISBN: 978 3 030271831 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8_2
  • Herkman, Juha; Harjuniemi, Timo (2015). “Unity or heterogeneity: The promise of a European public sphere?”. In: Picard, Robert-G. (ed.). The euro crisis in the media: Journalistic coverage of economic crisis and European institution. Oxford: I. B. Tauris, pp. 221-235. ISBN: 978 1 784530600 https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755694990.ch-011
  • Höpner, Martin; Jurczyk, Bojan (2015). “How the Eurobarometer blurs the line between research and propaganda”. MPIfG Discussion paper, n. 15/6. Colonia: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/121867/1/838014135.pdf
  • Hutter, Swen; Kriesi, Hanspeter (2019). “Politicizing Europe in times of crisis”. Journal of European public policy, v. 26, n. 7, pp. 996-1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1619801
  • Kermer, Jan-Erik; Nijmeijer, Rolf A. (2020). “Identity and European public spheres in the context of social media and information disorder”. Media and communication, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 28-39. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3167
  • Krzyżanowski, Michał (2019). “Brexit and the imaginary of ‘crisis’: a discourse conceptual analysis of European news media”. Critical discourse studies, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 465-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001
  • Langer, Ana-Ines; Gruber, Johannes B. (2021). “Political agenda setting in the hybrid media system: why legacy media still matter a great deal”. The international journal of press/politics, v. 26, n. 2, pp. 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220925023
  • Lloyd, John; Marconi, Cristina (2014). Reporting the EU: news, media and the European institutions. London: I. B. Tauris. ISBN: 978 1 784530655
  • Manfredi-Sánchez, Juan-Luis; Amado-Suárez, Adriana; Waisbord, Silvio (2021). “Presidential Twitter in the face of Covid-19: Between populism and pop politics”. Comunicar, n. 66, pp. 79-90. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-07
  • Nielsen, Rasmus-Kleis; Fletcher, Richard; Newman, Nic; Brennen, J. Scott; Howard, Philip N. (2020). Navigating the ‘infodemic’: how people in six countries access and rate news and information about coronavirus. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://bit.ly/3dT1EAY
  • Nordbrandt, Maria (2021). “Affective polarization in the digital age: Testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group parties”. New media & society, First online. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044393
  • Noy, Chaim (2008). “Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research”. International journal of social research methodology, v. 11, n. 4, pp. 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
  • Nulty, Paul; Theocharis, Yannis; Popa, Sebastian-Adrian; Parnet, Olivier; Benoit, Kenneth (2016). “Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament”. Electoral studies, v. 44, pp. 429-444. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.014
  • Pérez-Curiel, Concha; Velasco-Molpeceres, Ana-María (2020). “Impacto del discurso político en la difusión de bulos sobre Covid-19. Influencia de la desinformación en públicos y medios”. Revista latina de comunicación social, n. 78, pp. 86-119. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1469
  • Risse, Thomas (ed.) (2015). European public spheres: Politics is back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978 1 107441637 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139963343
  • Rivas-de-Roca, Rubén; García-Gordillo, Mar (2020). “Thematic agenda on Twitter in the 2019 European Parliament elections: a comparative study between ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ and national candidates”. Tripodos, n. 49, pp. 29-49. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2020.49p29-49
  • Rivas-de-Roca, Rubén; García-Gordillo, Mar (2021). “Understanding the European Public Sphere: a review of pending challenges in research”. European politics and society. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1884965
  • Sarikakis, Katharine; Kolokytha, Olga (2019). “EU democratic deficits: The EU project and a European public sphere”. In: Arnold, Klaus; Preston, Paschal; Kinnebrock, Susanne (eds.). The handbook of European communication history. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 315-331. ISBN: 978 1119161622 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119161783.ch17
  • Treib, Oliver (2021). “Euroscepticism is here to stay: what cleavage theory can teach us about the 2019 European Parliament elections”. Journal of European public policy, v. 28, n. 2, pp. 174-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1737881
  • Tuñón-Navarro, Jorge; Bouza-García, Luis (eds.) (2021). Europa en tiempos de desinformación y pandemia: periodismo y política paneuropeos ante la crisis del Covid-19 y las fake news. Granada: Comares. ISBN: 978 84 13690636
  • Tuñón-Navarro, Jorge; Carral-Vilar, Uxía (2021). “Has Covid-19 promoted or discouraged a European public sphere? Comparative analysis of the Twitter interactions of German, French, Italian and Spanish MEPSs during the pandemic”. Communication & society, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 135-151. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.34.3.135-151
  • Tuñón-Navarro, Jorge; Oleart, Álvaro; Bouza-García, Luis (2019). “Actores europeos y desinformación: la disputa entre el factchecking, las agendas alternativas y la geopolítica”. Revista de comunicación, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 245-260. https://doi.org/10.26441/rc18.2-2019-a12
  • Vaccari, Cristian (2017). “Online mobilization in comparative perspective: Digital appeals and political engagement in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom”. Political communication, v. 34, n. 1, pp. 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1201558
  • Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia (2016). “European elections and Facebook: Political advertising and deliberation?”. In: Deželan, Tomaž; Vobič, Igor (eds.). (R)evolutionizing political communication through social media. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference/IGI Global, pp. 191-209. ISBN: 978 1 466698796 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9879-6.ch010
  • Wang, Yan; Hao, Haiyan; Platt, Lisa S. (2021). “Examining risk and crisis communications of government agencies and stakeholders during early-stages of Covid-19 on Twitter”. Computers in human behavior, v. 114, 106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106568
  • Weiss, Robert-Stuart (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press. ISBN: 978 0 684823126
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet