El impacto ambiental de la alimentaciónargumentos de alumnado de Magisterio y Secundaria

  1. Brocos, Pablo 1
  2. Jiménez-Aleixandre, María Pilar 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Journal:
Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

ISSN: 0212-4521,  2174-6486

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 38

Issue: 1

Pages: 127-145

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ENSCIENCIAS.2802 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

Abstract

Human diet is almost solely considered in nutritional terms, without paying attention to its impact on the environment. This study examines how pre-service teachers and high school students perceive five dimensions of diet (nutritional, environmental, economic, ethical and cultural-personal), particularly focusing on environment. The research questions are: 1) how does their assessment of the environmental impact of diet change in the context of an argumentative teaching sequence? 2) Which data do they use and how do they use them in their arguments about the appropriateness of different diets according to environmental criteria? Their perceptions change from an initial invisibility of the environmental impact of diets to a full consideration of its relevance and an increased presence of the environment in their arguments. We suggest a need for problematizing diet and its sustainability, making its environmental impact more visible.

€ View funding

Funding information

Este trabajo ha sido apoyado por el Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades mediante el proyecto PGC2018-096581-B-C22; y por el Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, mediante la concesión del contrato predoctoral FPU14/03755, del que fue beneficiario el primer autor. Agradecemos también a los revisores sus comentarios y sugerencias, que han contribuido a mejorar la calidad del artículo.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Achieve (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Agraso, M. F. y Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2003). Percepción de los problemas ambientales por el alumnado: los recursos naturales. Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales, 17, 91-105.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69(4), 453-475. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730690403
  • Austgulen, M., Skuland, S., Schjøll, A. y Alfnes, F. (2018). Consumer Readiness to Reduce Meat Consumption for the Purpose of Environmental Sustainability: Insights from Norway. Sustainability, 10(9), 3058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093058
  • Barab, S. y Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
  • Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition (2016). Double Pyramid 2016. Parma: BCFN.
  • Bauer, H. H., Heinrich, D. y Schäfer, D. B. (2013). The effects of organic labels on global, local, and private brands: More hype than substance? Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.028
  • Behrens, P., Kiefte-de Jong, J. C., Bosker, T., Rodrigues, J. F., De Koning, A. y Tukker, A. (2017). Evaluating the environmental impacts of dietary recommendations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(51), 13412-13417. https://doi.org/10.1530/ey.15.14.7
  • Bravo. B. y Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2014). Articulación del uso de pruebas y el modelo de flujo de energía en los ecosistemas en argumentos de alumnado de bachillerato. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1281
  • Brocos, P. y Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2015). Developing criteria and arguments about sustainable and healthy diets: the vegetarianism dilemma. Comunicación presentada en el 11th International Conference for the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA). Helsinki, Finlandia.
  • Campbell-Arvai, V. (2015). Food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours among university undergraduates: a mixed-methods study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-06-2013-0071
  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268-291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x07309371
  • Erduran, S. y Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Evans, J. St. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 978-996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.978
  • FAO (2009). How to Feed the World in 2050. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma, Italia.
  • FAO y FCRN (2016). Plates, pyramids, planet. Página web. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5640e.pdf. Visitada en febrero de 2019.
  • Garnett T. (2014). What is a sustainable healthy diet? A discussion paper. Oxford, UK: Food Climate Research Network (FCRN).
  • Glaser, B. G. y Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Godfrey, D. M. y Feng, P. (2017). Communicating sustainability: Student perceptions of a behavior change campaign. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(1), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-01-2015-0009
  • Hartmann, C., Dohle, S. y Siegrist, M. (2013). Importance of cooking skills for balanced food choices. Appetite, 65, 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.016
  • Hyland, J. J., Henchion, M., McCarthy, M. y MCCarthy, S. (2017). The role of meat in strategies to achieve a sustainable diet lower in greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Meat Science, 132, 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.014
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. y Brocos, P. (2018). Shifts in epistemic status in argumentation and in conceptual change. En T. G. Amin y O. Levrini (Eds.), Converging Perspectives on Conceptual Change: Mapping an Emerging Paradigm in the Learning Sciences (pp. 171-179). Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo-Rodríguez, A. y Duschl, R. A. (2000). «Doing the Lesson» or «Doing Science»: Argument in High School Genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237x(200011)84:6 757::aid-sce5 .0.co;2-f
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre M. P. y Crujeiras, B. (2017). Epistemic Practices and Scientific Practices in Science Education. En K. S. Taber y B. Akpan (Eds.), Science Education. New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 69-80). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Puig, B., Bravo, B. y Crujeiras, B. (2014). The role of discursive contexts in argumentation. Comunicación presentada en National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST) Annual Meeting. Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Jin, H., Mehl, C. E. y Lan, D. H. (2015). Developing an analytical framework for argumentation on energy consumption issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1132-1162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21237
  • Kahneman, D. y Egan, P. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (Vol. 1). Nueva York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity and epistemic practice. En R. A. Duschl y R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99-117). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Kelly, G. J. (2016). Methodological considerations for interactional perspectives on epistemic cognition. En J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval e I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 393-408). Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Kopnina, H. (2012). Education for sustainable development (ESD): the turn away from ‘environment’ in environmental education? Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 699-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.658028
  • Manni, A., Sporre, K. y Ottander, C. (2017). Emotions and values –A case study of meaning-making in ESE. Environmental Education Research, 23(4), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1175549
  • McGee, J. A. (2015). Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Agriculture and Human Values, 32(2), 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9702-7
  • Morin, O., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., Tytler, R. y Barraza, L. (2014). Developing and using an S3R model to analyze reasoning in web-based cross-national exchanges on sustainability. Science Education, 98, 517-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21113
  • OECD (2013). PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework. París: OECD Publishing.
  • Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. En N. G. Lederman, y S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, vol. II (pp. 579-599). Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Papadouris, N. (2012). Optimization as a reasoning strategy for dealing with socioscientific decision-making situations. Science Education, 96(4), 600-630. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21016
  • Pimentel, D. y Pimentel, M. (2003). Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78(3), 660S-663S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/78.3.660s
  • Real Decreto 1105/2014, de 26 de diciembre, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y del Bachillerato. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 3, 212. Madrid, 3 de enero de 2015.
  • Ruby, M. B. (2012). Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. Appetite, 58(1), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019
  • Searchinger, T., Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J., Lipinski, B., Waite, R., Winterbottom, R., Dinshaw, A. y Heimlich, R. (2014). Creating a sustainable food future. A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people by 2050. World Resources Report 2013-14: Interim Findings.
  • Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. y Foley, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature, 485(7397), 229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11069
  • Slovic, P. (2013). Risk, media and stigma: Understanding public challenges to modern science and technology. Routledge.
  • Smith, R. B., Karousos, N. G., Cowham, E., Davis, J. y Billington, S. (2008). Covert approaches to countering adult chemophobia. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(3), 379. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p379
  • Smith-Spangler, C., Brandeau, M. L., Hunter, G. E., Bavinger, J. C., Pearson, M., Eschbach, P. J., ... y Olkin, I. (2012). Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives?: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 157(5), 348-366. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007
  • Sorti, D. (2016). Percepción de alumnos de secundaria sobre problemáticas ambientales. Agromensajes, 45, 25-36.
  • Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., van Vuuren, D. P., den Elchen, M. G. J., Eickhout, B. y Kabat, P. (2009). Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic Change, 95, 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/6/26/262009
  • Thompson, S., Gower, R., Darmon, N., Vieux, F., Murphy-Bokern, D. y Maillot, M. (2013). A balance of healthy and sustainable food choices for France, Spain, and Sweden. Surrey, UK: World Wildlife Fund.
  • Tilman, D. y Clark, M. (2014). Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature, 515(7528), 518-522. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13959
  • Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. y Siegrist, M. (2011). Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57(3), 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010
  • UNESCO (2017). Educación para los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: Objetivos de Aprendizaje. París: UNESCO.
  • Winkler, E. y Turrell, G. (2009). Confidence to cook vegetables and the buying habits of Australian households. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(10), 1759-1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.07.006
  • Wu, Y. T. y Tsai, C. C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio‐scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903505661
Data source: Dialnet