Una experiencia sobre seguridad alimentaria para trabajar la argumentación en el aula de educación secundaria

  1. Lucía Casas Quiroga 1
  2. Beatriz Crujeiras Pérez 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Didácticas Aplicadas, Área de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Journal:
Revista Eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias

ISSN: 1697-011X

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 2201

Type: Article

DOI: 10.25267/REV_EUREKA_ENSEN_DIVULG_CIENC.2019.V16.I2.2201 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

This research describes a classroom experience aimed at engaging high school students in the scientific practice of argumentation, using food safety as framework. A sequence of four activities is presented, in order to be used in 10th and 11th grade in the optional subjects of Applied Sciences for Professional Activity and Scientific Culture. This pretends to be a resource for science teachers who are interested in the introduction of learning approaches through scientific practices. This experience proves its usefulness in that students are able to build knowledge through reflection and justification of socio-scientific issues related to food safety

€ View funding

Funding information

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Giacalone, D. (2016). Enhancing Student Learning with Case-Based Teaching and Audience Response Systems in an Interdisciplinary Food Science Course. Higher Learning Research Communications, 6 (3).
  • Henderson, J., Knutton, S., Lally, V., Windale, M. (1991). Biotechnology and the food industry. Journal of Biological Education, 25, 95-102.
  • Jideani, V. A., Jideani, I. A. (2012). Alignment of Assessment Objectives with Instructional Objectives Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy—The Case for Food Science and Technology Education. Journal of Food Science Education, 11, 34-42.
  • Jiménez Aleixandre, M.P. (2010). 10 Ideas Clave. Competencias en argumentación y uso de pruebas. Barcelona: Graó.
  • Jin, H., Mehl, C. E., Lan, D. H. (2015). Developing an Analytical Framework for Argumentation on Energy Consumption Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1132-1162.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) (2015). Science Teachers Learning: Enhancing Opportunities, Creating Supportive Contexts. Committee on Strengthening Science Education through a Teacher Learning Continuum. Board on Science Education and Teacher Advisory Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación/Organización Mundial de la Salud (FAO/OMS). (2011). Guía FAO/OMS para la aplicación de principios y procedimientos de análisis de riesgos en situaciones de emergencia relativas a la inocuidad de los alimentos. Roma: FAO/OMS.
  • Reiser, B. J., Berland, L. K., Kenyon, L. (2012). Engaging Students in Scientific Practices of Explantion and Argumentation. Science and Children, 49(8), 8-13.
Data source: Dialnet