La dimensión transfronteriza de los planes territoriales y urbanísticos en el ámbito vasco (España-Francia)

  1. Alexander Amado 1
  2. Valerià Paül 1
  3. Juan-Manuel Trillo-Santamaría 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Geografía, Santiago de Compostela, España
  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Geografí
Revista:
Estudios Fronterizos

ISSN: 2395-9134,  0187-6961

Ano de publicación: 2024

Número: 25

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Estudios Fronterizos

Resumo

Cross-border cooperation has emerged as one of the key elements of de-bordering. The conventional role of borders as the insurmountable boundaries of the state has been diluted, among other reasons, by the territorial cooperation policies promoted by the European Union since the 1990s. However, regarding spatial planning, the state-national logic prevails, despite many initiatives in the opposite direction. For this reason, creating planning figures adapted to this new framework remains a challenge. In this sense, the present research seeks to settle the treatment of the (cross)border aspect in the spatial planning documents of the Basque territorial area, both on a regional and local scale. The study results show that state logics continue to prevail when it comes to the planning and management of a border territorial context.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ayuntamiento de Etxalar. (2000). Plan Municipal de Etxalar.Normas urbanísticas. https://www.etxalar.eus/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Etxalarko-hirigintza-plana-hirigintza-arauak-2000-1-28.pdf
  • Ayuntamiento de Irun. (2015). Plan general de ordenación urbana. https://www.irun.org/es/urbanismo-vivienda/planes-ordenacion-ejecucion-gestion/plan-general-de-ordenacion-urbana
  • Bakry, A. & Growe, A. (2024). Spatial effect of ethnicity on cross-border regions. Comparative analysis for a cultural aspect based on territorial and network perspectives: the cases of the eu Basque and Upper Rhine border regions. European Planning Studies, 32(2), 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2120764
  • Beck, J. M. (2008). Has the Basque borderland become more Basque after opening the Franco-Spanish border? National Identities, 10(4), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608940802518914
  • Booth, P. (2015). What can we learn from France? Some reflections on the methodologies of cross-national research. En E. A. Silva, P. Healey, N. Harris & P. Van den Broeck (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of planning research methods (pp. 84-96). Routledge.
  • Caesar, B. (2017). European groupings of territorial cooperation: a means to harden spatially dispersed cooperation? Regional Studies. Regional Science, 4(1), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2017.1394216
  • Committee of the Regions. (2007). The European grouping of territorial cooperation.(CdR 117/2007, Study). European Union. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/docu-ment?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=7eddb54cca18e511ba96e8f7efd6ee6784b7f086
  • Commune d’Urrugne. (2019). Urrugne. Plan local d’urbanisme. https://www.communaute-paysbasque.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/mediatheque/Documents/Enquete_publique/Enquete_publique_Revision_generale_du_PLU_d_Urrugne/D_reglement.pdf
  • De Vries, J. (2008). Breaking the deadlock: lessons from cross-border spatial projects in Flanders and the Netherlands. disP - The Planning Review, 44(172), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557002
  • Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy & Martinos, H. (2017). Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions. Case study No. 14. Business. Complex rules hampering cross-border activities (Greece – Bulgaria). Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2776/712851
  • Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Styczyńska, I. & Po, D. (2017). Easing legal and administrative obstacles in eu border regions. Case study No. 15. Healthcare. Obstacles to the efficiency and effectiveness of health systems (Estonia-Latvia). Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/es/publication-detail/-/publication/ae5f3ca7-6b67-11e7-b2f2-01aa75ed71a1
  • Durà, A., Camonita, F., Berzi, M. & Noferini, A. (2018). Euroregions, excellence and innovation across EU borders. A catalogue of good practices. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/evidence-and-data/euroregions-excellence-and-innovation-across-eu-borders-catalogue-good-practices.html
  • Durand, F. (2014). Challenges of cross-border spatial planning in the metropolitan regions of Luxembourg and Lille. Planning Practice & Research, 29(2), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2014.896148
  • Durand, F. & Decoville, A. (2018). Establishing cross-border spatial planning. En E. Medeiros, (Ed.), European territorial cooperation. Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 229-244). Springer.
  • Durand, F. & Perrin, T. (2017). Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai: cross-border integration with or without the border? European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417704688
  • Esparza Zabalegi, J. M. (2011). Mapas para una nación: Euskal Herria en la cartografía y en los testimonios históricos. Txalaparta.
  • European Commission. (1999). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. Denmark. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a7342edc-968b-43d3-bf51-d0cc42bc7642
  • European Commission. (2023). Interreg: European territorial co-operation. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/policy/cooperation/european-territorial_en
  • European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional/Spatial Planning. (1973, 25-27 de septiembre). Resolution No. 2 on frontier regions and regional planning. 2nd
  • European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional/Spatial Planning on “Objectives of a European regional planning policy”, La Grande Motte, Francia. https://rm.coe.int/2nd-european-conference-of-ministers-responsible-for-regional-spatial-/168076c931
  • European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional/Spatial Planning. (1983, 19-20 de mayo). Resolution No. 2 on The European regional/spatial planning charter (Torremolinos charter). 6th European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning on “Prospects of development and of spatial planning in maritime regions”, Torremolinos, España. https://rm.coe.int/6th-european-conference-of-ministers-responsible-for-regional-planning/168076dd93
  • Evrard, E. & Engl, A. (2018). Taking stock of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (egtc): from policy formulation to policy implementation. En E. Medeiros (Ed.), European territorial cooperation. Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 209-227). Springer.
  • Faludi, A. (2018). The poverty of territorialism. A neo-medieval view of Europe and European planning. Edward Elgar.
  • Farinós, J. (2007). espon project 2.3.2.Governance of territorial and urban policies from EU to local level. Final report. Part i. European Spatial Planning Observation Network / Instituto Inter-Universitario de Desarrollo Local. https://archive.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/fr-2.3.2_final_feb2007.pdf
  • Frank, S., Spyra, M. & Fürst, C. (2017). Requirements for cross-border spatial planning technologies in the European context. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 3(1), 39-46. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cass-2017-0004/html
  • Friedmann, J. (2005). Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Progress in Planning,64(3), 183-234. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&-type=pdf&doi=dc3dbad05e9c96c99700df2ae20f1ab5379c5a22
  • Fullaondo, A. & Zabalo, J. (2021). In favour of a Basque State. A paradigm shift? Na-tions and Nationalism, 28(3), 924-940. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12711
  • García Morales, V. Y. (2013). Competencias locales y protección del medio ambiente: especial referencia al planeamiento urbanístico municipal. Cuadernos de Derecho Local, 32, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.61521/cuadernosderecholocal.32.592
  • Gobierno de Navarra. (2005). Estrategia territorial de Navarra. Directrices para la ordenación del territorio. https://gobiernoabierto.navarra.es/sites/default/files/estrategia_territorial_de_navarra_compressed.pdf
  • Gobierno de Navarra. (2011a). Plan de ordenación territorial. pot 1 Pirineo. https://administracionelectronica.navarra.es/SIUN_Consulta/Index.html#/instrumento/104423
  • Gobierno de Navarra. (2011b). Plan de ordenación territorial. pot 2 Navarra Atlántica. https://administracionelectronica.navarra.es/SIUN_Consulta/Index.html#/instrumento/104424
  • Gobierno de Navarra. (2023). La estrategia territorial de Navarra (etn). https://www.navarra.es/es/territorio-paisaje-y-urbanismo/ordenacion-del-territorio/estrategia-territorial-de-navarra
  • Gobierno Vasco. (1997). Directrices de ordenación territorial de la comunidad autónoma del País Vasco (1997). https://www.euskadi.eus/web01-a2lurral/es/contenidos/informacion/dot_1997/es_def/index.shtml
  • Gobierno Vasco. (2016). Plan territorial parcial de Donostia-San Sebastián (Donostialdea-Bajo Bidasoa). https://www.euskadi.eus/ptp-donostialdea/web01-a3lurral/es/
  • Gobierno Vasco. (2019). Directrices de ordenación territorial (dot). https://www.euskadi.eus/directrices-de-ordenacion-territorial-dot/web01-a2lurral/es/
  • Gómez Orea, D. (2002). Ordenación territorial. Mundi-Prensa.
  • Guillermo-Ramírez, M. (2018). The added value of European territorial cooperation. Drawing from case studies. En E. Medeiros (Ed.), European territorial cooperation. The urban book series (pp. 25-47). Springer.
  • Guillermo-Ramírez, M. & Nikolov, A. (2015). Spatial planning and cross-border cooperation.Association of European Border Regions.Guillermo Ramírez, M. & Trillo Santamaría, J. M. (2023). La cooperació transfronterera en una Europa convulsa. Revista Catalana de Ciències Socials, 13, 17-36. https://revistes.iec.cat/index.php/CSSr/article/view/150875
  • Hildenbrand Scheid, A. (1996). Política de ordenación del territorio en Europa. Universidad de Sevilla.
  • Jacobs, J. (2014). Spatial planning in cross-border regions: a systems-theoretical perspective. Planning Theory, 15(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214547149
  • Jacobs, J. & Van Assche, K. (2014). Understanding empirical boundaries: a systems-theoretical avenue in border studies. Geopolitics, 19(1), 182-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2013.830106
  • Kessler, O. & Helmig, J. (2007). Of systems, boundaries, and regionalisation. Geopolitics, 12(4), 570-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040701546053
  • Knippschild, R. (2011). Cross-border spatial planning: understanding, designing and managing cooperation processes in the German-Polish-Czech borderland. European Planning Studies,19(4), 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548464
  • Leizaola, A. (2000). Mugarik ez! Subverting the border in the Basque Country. Ethnologia Europaea, 30(2), 35-46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346324615_Mugarik_ez_Subverting_the_Border_ind_the_Basque_Country
  • Letamendia, F. (1997). Basque nationalism and cross‐border co‐operation between the Southern and Northern Basque countries. Regional & Federal Studies, 7(2), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569708421004
  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, (140), 1-55.
  • Lozano-Valencia, P. J. & Latasa, I. (2019). Territorio y territorialidad, algunas reflexiones e ideas sobre el espacio de Euskal Herria desde la geografía y en un paradigma de crisis política. En Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles & Universitat de València (Eds.), Crisis y espacios de oportunidad. Retos para la geografía (pp. 13-27).
  • Lukkonen, J. (2010). Territorial cohesion policy in the light of peripherality. Town Planning Review, 81(4), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2010.12
  • Medeiros, E. (2014). Territorial cohesion trends in inner Scandinavia: the role of cross-border cooperation - INTERREG-A 1994-2010. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 68(5), 310-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.960949
  • Medeiros, E., Scott, J., Ferreira, R. C. B., Boijmans, P., Verschelde, N., Guillermo Ramírez, M., Ocskay, G., Peyrony, J. & Soares, A. (2023). European territorial cooperation towards territorial cohesion? Regional Studies, 58(8), 1518-1529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2226698
  • Newman, D. (2006). Borders and bordering: towards an interdisciplinary dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006063331
  • Nienaber, B. & Wille, C. (2020). Cross-border cooperation in Europe: a relational perspective. European Planning Studies, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1623971
  • Paasi, A. (2009). Bounded spaces in a ‘borderless world’: border studies, power and the anatomy of territory. Journal of Power, 2(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290903064275
  • Paasi, A. & Zimmerbauer, K. (2016). Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A: economy and Space,48(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15594805
  • Pascual, J. M. (1999). La estrategia de las ciudades. Los planes estratégicos como instrumentos: métodos, técnicas y buenas prácticas. Diputació de Barcelona.
  • Paül Carril, V. (2022). A Estratexia do Río Miño Transfronteirizo 2030: unha ordenación territorial para a raia húmida galegoportuguesa? Revista Galega de Economía, 31(2), 47-73. https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/rge/article/view/8291/12071
  • Pujadas, R. & Font, J. (1998). Ordenación y planificación territorial. Síntesis.Ruiz Urrestarazu, E. & Galdós Urrutia, R. (2008). Geografía del País Vasco. Nerea.Rumford, C. (2006). Introduction. Theorizing borders. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006063330
  • Svensson, S. & Balogh, P. (2018). Limits to integration: persisting border obstacles in the eu. En E. Medeiros (Ed.), European territorial cooperation. Theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe (pp. 115-134). Springer.
  • Syndicat d’Études pour l’Élaboration du SCoT Sud Pays Basque. (2005). Le schéma de cohérence territoriale du sud Pays Basque a été approuvé en 2005. https://www.scot-pbs.fr/le-scot-sud-pays-basque/
  • Taylor, P. J. (1994). The state as a container: territoriality in the modern world system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259401800202
  • Tilly, C. (1984). Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Trillo Santamaría, J. M. & Lois González, R. C. (2014). Estrategias para cuestionar el control central del espacio estatal. Acción exterior y cooperación transfronteriza. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales,18(493[49]). https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/ScriptaNova/article/view/15038
  • Wassenberg, B. & Reitel, B. (Eds.). (2020). Critical dictionary on borders, cross-border coop-eration and European integration. Peter Lang.
  • Waterhout, B., Mourato, J. M. & Böhme, K. (2009). The impact of europeanisation on planning cultures. En J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), Planning cultures in Europe. Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning (pp. 239-254).
  • Zoido, F., De la Vega, S., Piñeiro, A., Morales, G., Mas, R., Lois, R. C. & González, J. M. (2013). Diccionario de urbanismo, geografía urbana y ordenación del territorio.Cátedra.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet