Environmental prospective of valorizing corn processing effluent to produce ferulic acid grafted chitosan polymer

  1. Arias, Ana
  2. Torres, Eduardo
  3. García-Zamora, José Luis
  4. Pacheco-Aguirre, Francisco M.
  5. Feijoo, Gumersindo
  6. Moreira, Maria Teresa
Revista:
Journal of Environmental Management

ISSN: 0301-4797,  1095-8630

Ano de publicación: 2024

Volume: 360

Páxinas: 121210

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2024.121210 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Journal of Environmental Management

Resumo

The food industry requires new production models that include more environmentally friendly waste management practices, considering that the environmental loads of solid waste and wastewater associated with this sector cause damage to the receiving ecosystems. The approach considered in this study focuses on the design and environmental assessment of an enzymatic process for the valorization of ferulic acid present in the effluent of a corn tortilla plant. The ferulic acid can be immobilized on chitosan so that the ferulic acid grafted chitosan can be used as a bioactive film with enhanced antioxidant properties with potential applications in the biotechnology sector.Its real projection approach requires the evaluation of its environmental and economic performance, trying to identify its benefits and potential in the value chain, using the Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) as a phase for the conceptual design of the process and the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology for the environmental evaluation. It should be noted that the TEA indicators are promising, since the values of the financial indicators obtained are representative of the economic profitability, which makes the ferulic acid valorization a viable process. In terms of the environmental impact of the process, the buffer dose and the chitosan production process are identified as the main critical points. This double benefit in environmental and economic terms shows that the valorization of ferulic acid for chitosan functionalization is a promising alternative to improve the sustainability performance of corn processing.

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acosta-Estrada, (2014), J. Cereal. Sci., 60, pp. 264, 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.04.006
  • Bao, (2023), Pharmacol. Rep., 75, pp. 891, 10.1007/s43440-023-00494-0
  • Bolzonella, (2007), Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing, 1, pp. 573, 10.1533/9781845692520.5.573
  • Borges, (2013), Microb. Drug Resist., 19, pp. 256, 10.1089/mdr.2012.0244
  • Castañeda‐Ruelas, (2021), Cereal Chem., 98, pp. 1165, 10.1002/cche.10467
  • Castro-Muñoz, (2015), Food Bioprod. Process., 95, pp. 7, 10.1016/j.fbp.2015.03.006
  • Castro-Muñoz, (2016), Waste and biomass valorization, 7, pp. 1167, 10.1007/s12649-016-9512-6
  • Castro-Muñoz, (2018), Waste and Biomass Valorization, 9, pp. 513, 10.1007/s12649-017-0003-1
  • Castro-Muñoz, (2020), Trends Food Sci. Technol., 95, pp. 219, 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.003
  • Castro-Muñoz, (2023), Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 191, pp. 401, 10.1016/j.cherd.2023.01.049
  • Castro-Muñoz, (2023), Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 125424
  • Castro-Muñoz, (2022), Separ. Purif. Technol., 281, 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119979
  • Ciliberto, (2021), Bus. Strat. Environ., 30, pp. 3255, 10.1002/bse.2801
  • Cosme, (2023), ChemBioEng Rev., 10, pp. 112, 10.1002/cben.202200017
  • Dasagrandhi, (2018), Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19, pp. 2157, 10.3390/ijms19082157
  • Diao, (2020), J. Food Sci. Technol., 57, pp. 2259, 10.1007/s13197-020-04263-2
  • Díaz-Montes, (2022), Curr. Res. Food Sci., 5, pp. 1, 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.11.012
  • Díaz-Montes, (2016), Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas, 8, pp. 41, 10.5154/r.inagbi.2016.03.002
  • España-Gamboa, (2018), Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser., 25, pp. 712, 10.1007/s11356-017-0479-z
  • Farooq
  • Finkbeiner
  • García-Zamora, (2015), Process Biochem., 50, pp. 125, 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.10.012
  • Hernández-Pinto, (2024), Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129309
  • Holguin-Acuña, (2011), pp. 153
  • Humbird, (2011)
  • Ioannidou, (2022), Bioresour. Technol., 348, 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126295
  • Islam, (2014), pp. 443
  • Khatun, (2020), Carbohydrate Polym., 246, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116483
  • Kim, (2014), pp. 467
  • Kumar, (2014), Biotechnology Reports, 4, pp. 86, 10.1016/j.btre.2014.09.002
  • Li, (2017), Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 105, pp. 1539, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.103
  • Li, (2021), J. Mol. Struct., 1227, 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129353
  • López-Pacheco, (2019), Sci. Total Environ., 676, pp. 356, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.278
  • Lyu, (2020), Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 155, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104663
  • Prieto-Sandoval, (2018), J. Clean. Prod., 179, pp. 605, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224
  • Pulluru, (2017), Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 40, pp. 2677, 10.1016/B978-0-444-63965-3.50448-7
  • Raj, (2022), Health Sciences Review, 100063
  • Ramírez-Romero, (2013), Rev. Mex. Ing. Quim., 12, pp. 463
  • Riofrio, (2021), ACS Omega, 10.1021/acsomega.1c01672
  • Santiago, (2020), Chem. Eng. J., 392, 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123772
  • Serna-Saldivar, (2015), pp. 29
  • Shivashankara, (2015), pp. 163
  • Shrivastava, (2022), Chemosphere, 293, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133553
  • Siddiqui, (2022), Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 308, 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102772
  • Téllez-Pérez, (2018), Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient., 34, pp. 395, 10.20937/RICA.2018.34.03.03
  • Turton, (2008)
  • Ulrich, (1984), pp. 352
  • Valderrama-Bravo, (2022), J. Food Eng., 328, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111058
  • Valenzuela, (2023), Sci. Total Environ., 168674
  • Wang, (2018), Food Hydrocolloids, 80, pp. 281, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.11.031
  • Wang, (2021), Foods, 10, pp. 1374, 10.3390/foods10061374
  • Zheng, (2020), LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 120, pp. 108932, 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108932