Emoción, institución y cambio de administraciones

  1. Lagares Diez, Nieves 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España
Journal:
Uru: Revista de Comunicación y Cultura

ISSN: 2631-2514

Year of publication: 2023

Issue Title: Comunicación Política y transición democrática

Issue: 7

Pages: 85-102

Type: Article

DOI: 10.32719/26312514.2023.7.5 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Uru: Revista de Comunicación y Cultura

Abstract

From a brief diachronic overview of the evolution of political science and its relationship with citizenship, the social rituals that shape the political actions that exist today are established, including elections and administration transitions. In the specific case, the process of change of administration in Bolivia in 2019 and the US elections of 2020 are analyzed, in order to exemplify how political  communication is emotional both in the election and in the construction of the institutional image of the new administration.

Bibliographic References

  • Almond, Gabriel, y Sidney Verba. 1989. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park (CA), US: Sage. https://bit.ly/3EXAeI1.
  • Arias, Manuel. 2016. La democracia sentimental: Política y emociones en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Página Indómita. https://bit.ly/3CQx5Hk.
  • Bartolini, Stefano, y Peter Mair. 1990. Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885-1985. Cambridge (MA), US: Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/3s9rMO9.
  • Bodei, Remo. 1991. Geometria delle passioni. Paura, speranza e felicità: Filosofía e uso politico. Milán: Feltrinelli. https://bit.ly/3MIuTGg.
  • Brody, Richard, y Lawrence Rothenberg. 1988. “The Instability of Partisanship: An Analysis of the 1980 Presidential Election”. British Journal of Political Science 18 (4): 445-65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400005214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400005214
  • Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller y Donald Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Nueva York: Wiley. https://bit.ly/3VGx4OF.
  • Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Nueva York: HarperCollins. https://bit.ly/3MI0l7z.
  • —. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Nueva York: Harcourt. https://bit.ly/3yWmOrT.
  • Dixon, Thomas. 2006. From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category. Cambridge (MA), US: Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/3TzFHbP.
  • Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven (CT), US: Yale University Press. https://bit.ly/3VAEKSB.
  • Franklin, Charles, y John Jackson. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification”. The American Political Science Review 77 (4): 957-73. https://bit.ly/3CN0eUv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1957569
  • Jackson, John. 1975. “Issues, Party Choices, and Presidential Votes”. American Journal of Political Science 19 (2): 161-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2110431
  • Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson y Hazel Gaudet. 1944. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. Nueva York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce. https://bit.ly/3s8rBT1.
  • Lipset, Seymour, y Stein Rokkan, eds. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. Nueva York: Free Press. https://bit.ly/3SbGLS5.
  • Maiz, Ramón. 2010. “La hazaña de la razón: La exclusión fundacional de las emociones en la teoría política moderna”. Revista de Estudios Políticos 149: 11-45. https://bit.ly/2maCm8M.
  • —. 2011. “The Political Mind and Its Other: Rethinking the Non-place of Passions in Modern Political Theory”. En Politics and Emotions: The Obama Phenomenon, editado por Marcos Engelken-Jorge, Pedro Ibarra y Carmelo Moreno, 29-70. Berlín: VS Verlag. https://bit.ly/3VIVCXm.
  • Marcus, George, Nicholas Valentino, Pavlos Vasilopoulos y Martial Foucault. 2019. “Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties”. Political Psychology 40 (S1): 109-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12571
  • McCarthy, E. Doyle. 1994. “The Social Construction of Emotions: New Directions from Culture Theory”. Social Perspectives on Emotion 2: 267-79. https://bit.ly/3scfF2W.
  • Mercier, Hugo, y Dan Sperber. 2011. “Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2): 57-111. https://bit.ly/3saCvaV. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968
  • Nie, Norman, Sidney Verba y John Petrocik. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge (MA), US: Harvard University Press. https://bit.ly/3TASY41.
  • Page, Benjamin, y Calvin Jones. 1979. “Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote”. American Political Science Review 73 (4): 1071-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1953990
  • Solomon, Robert. 1993. The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianápolis (IN), US: Hackett. https://bit.ly/3Tgp855.
  • Stokes, Donald. 1966. “Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency”. American Political Science Review 60 (1): 19-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1953803
  • Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, George Marcus, Nicholas Valentino y Martial Foucault. 2018. “Fear, Anger, and Voting for the Far Right: Evidence from the November 13, 2015 Paris Terror Attacks”. Political Psychology 40 (4): 679-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12513
  • Wattenberg, Martin. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge (MA), US: Harvard University Press. https://bit.ly/3s8jZjo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674865723
  • Zhang, Lei, y Carlton Clark, eds. 2019. Affect, Emotion, and Rhetorical Persuasion in Mass Communication. Nueva York: Routledge. https://bit.ly/3DbpOD6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351242370
Data source: Dialnet