Efecto normativo de la desigualdad económicaevidencias empíricas sobre el consumo conspicuo

  1. Andrea Velandia-Morales
  2. Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
  3. Rocío Martínez
Journal:
International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

ISSN: 0213-4748 1579-3680

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 38

Issue: 2

Pages: 412-455

Type: Article

More publications in: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

Abstract

Economic inequality has negative consequences at different levels. At the individual level, it may affect social perception and configure specific features that may generate a normative climate. The current research’s main goals were (a) to analyse the effects of inequality on the attributions of others’ consumer behaviour and (b) to provide empirical evidence about how inequality configures normative consumer habits focusing on luxury consumption. This work includes three preregistered experimental studies. In Study 1 (N = 276) and Study 2 (N = 301), we used a between-participants design with two experimental conditions (high vs. low inequality). In Study 3, we reversed the order of the variables to identify whether luxury consumption triggered expectations about the levels of inequality in a specific context. Results showed that in high (vs. low) economic inequality settings, participants inferred more materialism, status-seeking, status anxiety and conspicuous consumption in others. Furthermore, luxury consumption became a predictor of economic inequality. Thus, economic inequality affects attribution processes and works as a clue to infer descriptive norms in a society.

Bibliographic References

  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586
  • Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Korschun, D., & Romani, S. (2018). Consumers’ perceptions of luxury brands’ CSR initiatives: An investigation of the role of status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.111
  • Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781
  • Bowles, S., & Park, Y. (2005). Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right? Economic Journal, 115(507), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01042.x
  • Buttrick, N. R., & Oishi, S. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304
  • Chaudhuri, H., & Majumdar, S. (2006). Of diamonds and desires: Understanding conspicuous consumption from a contemporary marketing perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2006(11), 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/425089
  • Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2016). Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000059
  • Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.79
  • Côté, S., House, J., & Willer, R. (2015). High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(52), 15838–15843. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511536112
  • De Botton, A. (2004). Ansiedad por el estatus. Taurus.
  • Delhey, J., Schneickert, C., & Steckermeier, L. C. (2017). Sociocultural inequalities and status anxiety: Redirecting the spirit level theory. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 58(3), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715217713799
  • Du, H., Chen, A., Li, Y., Ma, L., Xing, Q., & Nie, Y. (2021). Perceived income inequality increases status seeking among low social class individuals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12455
  • Dubois, D., Jung, S. J., & Ordabayeva, N. (2021). The psychology of luxury consumption. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.011
  • Eastman, J., & Eastman, K. (2015). Conceptualizing a model of status consumption theory: An exploration of the antecedents and consequences of the motivation to consume for status. Marketing Management Journal, 25(1), 1–15. https://www.mmaglobal.org/_files/ugd/3968ca_99ffa62122ed4ca6a462c53c45a61e35.pdf
  • Eisinga, R., Te, G. M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00038-012-0416-3
  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Ramos, X. (2012, May). Inequality and happiness: A survey. Growing Inequalities Impacts. https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/111375/1/Ferrer-GINI-38.pdf
  • Fitzmaurice, J., & Comegys, C. (2006). Materialism and social consumption. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14(4), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679140403
  • García-Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Palacio Sañudo, J., David Polo, J., & Rentería Pérez, E. (2018). Perceptions of economic inequality and support for redistribution: The role of existential and utopian standards. Social Justice Research, 31(4), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-018-0317-6
  • Goldsmith, R. E., & Clark, R. A. (2012). Materialism, status consumption, and consumer Independence. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2011.555434
  • Goya-Tocchetto, D., & Payne, B. K. (2022). How economic inequality shapes thought and action. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(1), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCPY.1277
  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85
  • Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
  • Jaikumar, S., & Sarin, A. (2015). Conspicuous consumption and income inequality in an emerging economy: Evidence from India. Marketing Letters, 26(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9350-5
  • Jetten, J., & Peters, K. (2019). The social psychology of inequality. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 1–18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3
  • Jin, Y., Li, H., & Wu, B. (2011). Income inequality, consumption, and social-status seeking. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2010.12.004
  • Kasser, T., & Kanner, A. D. (2004). Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4317024
  • Kilsheimer, J. C. (1993). Status consumption: The development and status implications of a scale measuring the motivation to consume for status. A Dissertation submitted to the marketing. Faculty at Florida State University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304073895?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
  • Kraus, M. W., Park, J. W., & Tan, J. J. X. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616673192
  • Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0016357
  • Lado, N., & Villanueva Orbaiz, M. L. (1998). Los valores materiales en el comportamiento del consumidor: un estudio exploratorio de los jóvenes. ESIC. Escuela Superior de Gestión comercial y Marketing. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/7715
  • Melita, D., Velandia-Morales, A., Iruela-Toros, D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2020). Versión española de la Escala de Ansiedad por el Estatus [Spanish version of the status anxiety scale]. Revista de Psicologia Social, 35(2), 342–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1721050
  • Moreno-Bella, E., Willis, G. B., & Moya, M. (2019). Economic inequality and masculinity–femininity: The prevailing perceived traits in higher unequal contexts are masculine. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1590. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01590/BIBTEX
  • Moschis, G. P. (1981). Patterns of consumer learning. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 9(1–2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723571
  • Nelissen, R. M. A. A., & Meijers, M. H. C. C. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(5), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.12.002
  • Nishi, A., Shirado, H., Rand, D. G., & Christakis, N. A. (2015). Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature, 526(7573), 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15392
  • O’Cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.155
  • Ordabayeva, N., & Chandon, P. (2011). Getting ahead of the Joneses: When equality increases conspicuous consumption among bottom-tier consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/658165
  • Ostrovskaya, L., & Sarabia, F. (2013). Effect of materialism on the use of the brand name in purchasing decisions from a cross-cultural perspective. Esic Market Economic and Business, 44(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.7200/esicm.144.0441.3i
  • Paskov, M., Gërxhani, K., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2013). Income inequality and status anxiety. Growing Inequality Impacts, GINI Discussion Paper 90(August 2013), 1–46. AIAS https://gini-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/DP_90_Income-Inequality-and-Status-Anxiety.pdf
  • Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1086/209304
  • Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Bratanova, B., Willis, G. B., Lopez-Rodriguez, L., Sturrock, A., & Loughnan, S. (2017). Social class and ideologies of inequality: How they uphold unequal societies. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12206
  • Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., García-Sánchez, E., Petkanopoulou, K., & Willis, G. B. (2020). Inequality is in the air: Contextual psychosocial effects of power and social class. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.004
  • Rözer, J., Lancee, B., & Volker, B. (2022). Keeping up or giving up? Income inequality and materialism in Europe and the United States. Social Indicators Research, 159(2), 647–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-021-02760-1/TABLES/3
  • Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Jetten, J., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019). High economic inequality makes us feel less wealthy. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/IRSP.333
  • Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2022). Economic inequality affects perceived normative values. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220968141
  • Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Willis, G. B., Jetten, J., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2557
  • Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019). Economic and social distance: Perceived income inequality negatively predicts an interdependent self-construal. International Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12437
  • Shao, W., Grace, D., & Ross, M. (2019). Consumer motivation and luxury consumption: Testing moderating effects. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46(April2018), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.003
  • Sommet, N., Butera, F., Elliot, A. J., Jamieson, J. P., & Butera, F. (2018). Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach-avoidance. Journal of Personality, 87(4), 767–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12432
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). El precio de la desigualdad: El 1 por ciento de la población tiene lo que el 99 por ciento necesita. Taurus Pensamiento.
  • Stillman, T. F., Fincham, F. D., Vohs, K. D., Lambert, N. M., & Phillips, C. A. (2012). The material and immaterial in conflict: Spirituality reduces conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.08.012
  • Veblen, T. (2018). The theory of the leisure class. In D. B. Grusky & S. Szelényi (Eds.), Inequality: Classic readings in race, class, and gender (pp. 273–285). Routledge.
  • Velandia-Morales, A., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Martínez, R. (2022). Economic inequality increases the preference for status consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 809101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809101
  • Walasek, L., & Brown, G. D. A. (2015). Income inequality and status seeking: Searching for positional goods in unequal U.S. states. Psychological Science, 26(4), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567511
  • Walasek, L., & Brown, G. D. A. (2016). Income inequality, income, and internet searches for status goods: A cross-national study of the association between inequality and well-being. Social Indicators Research, 129(3), 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-015-1158-4
  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2017). The enemy between us: The psychological and social costs of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2275
  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2018). The inner level: How more equal societies reduce stress, restore sanity and improve everyone´s well-being. Penguin.