Assesing the perceptibility of prehistoric monuments on their landscape. An exploratory approach using agent-based modelling

  1. Rodríguez Rellán, Carlos 1
  2. Fábregas Valcarce, Ramón 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
Vegueta: Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia

ISSN: 1133-598X

Ano de publicación: 2023

Volume: 23

Número: 1

Páxinas: 115-145

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.51349/VEG.2023.1.05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Vegueta: Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

The perceptibility of a prehistoric monument (the property of being perceptible from its surrounding landscape) can be quite difficult to analyse by means of traditional static models. Such difficulty lies in the fact that perceptibility depends upon many other factors beyond simple topographical position, such as size, colour, contrast with the surroundings or even the specific circumstances of the audience, many such circumstances being of an immaterial nature. In this paper, we explore the potential use of Agent-Based Modelling for the analysis of archaeological perceptibility.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BRADLEY, R. (1997): Rock art and the Prehistory of Atlantic Europe, Routledge, London.
  • BRADLEY, R. (2002): Access, style and imagery: the audience for prehistoric rock art in Atlantic Spain and Portugal, 4000-2000 BC, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 21 (3): 231-247.
  • BRADLEY, R. (2009): Image and Audience. Rethinking prehistoric art, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • BRADLEY, R.; CRIADO, F.; FÁBREGAS, R. (1994): Rock art research as landscape archaeology: A pilot study in Galicia, north‐west Spain, World Archaeology, 25 (3): 374-390.
  • BRADLEY, R.; PHILLIPS, T.; RICHARDS, C.; WEBB, M. (2000): Decorating the Houses of the Dead: Incised and Pecked Motifs in Orkney Chambered Tombs, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11 (1): 45-67.
  • BUSTELO, J.; RODRÍGUEZ, C.; FÁBREGAS, R.; BARBEITO, V. (2017): Alén da Serra. O fenómeno tumular na Península do Barbanza a través dos SIX e a estatística espacial, Gallaecia: revista de arqueoloxía e antigüidade, 36: 53-72.
  • CARRERO-PAZOS, M. (2019): Density, intensity and clustering patterns in the spatial distribution of Galician megaliths (NW Iberian Peninsula), Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11 (5): 2097-2108.
  • CARRERO-PAZOS, M.; BEVAN, A.; LAKE, M.W. (2019): The spatial structure of Galician megalithic landscapes (NW Iberia): A case study from the Monte Penide region, Journal of Archaeological Science, 108: 104968.
  • CARRERO-PAZOS, M.; BUSTELO-ABUÍN, J.; BARBEITO-POSE, V.; RODRÍGUEZ-RELLÁN, C. (2020): Locational preferences and spatial arrangement in the barrow landscape of Serra do Barbanza (North-western Iberia), Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 31: 102351.
  • CASIMIR, M.J. (1992): The determinants of rights to pasture: territorial organization and ecological constraints, en M.J. CASIMIR and A. RAO (eds.), Mobility and territoriality: social and spatial boundaries among foragers, fishers, pastoralists, and peripatetics, Berg, New York: 153-203.
  • CRIADO BOADO, F. (1989): Megalitos, espacio, pensamiento, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 46: 75-98.
  • CRIADO BOADO, F.; VILLOCH VÁZQUEZ, V. (1998): La monumentalización del paisaje: percepción actual y sentido original en el Megalitismo de la Sierra de Barbanza (Galicia), Trabajos de Prehistoria, 55 (1): 63-80.
  • CRIADO BOADO, F.; VILLOCH VÁZQUEZ, V. (2000): Monumentalizing landscape: from present perception to the past meaning of Galician megalithism (North-West Iberian Peninsula), European Journal of Archaeology, 3 (2):188-216.
  • DE LA PEÑA SANTOS, A.; REY GARCÍA, J.M. (2001): Petroglifos de Galicia, Vía Láctea, A Coruña.
  • FÁBREGA-ÁLVAREZ, P.; PARCERO-OUBIÑA, C. (2007): Proposals for an archaeological analysis of pathways and movement, Archeologia e Calcolatori, 18: 121-140.
  • FÁBREGA-ÁLVAREZ, P.; PARCERO-OUBIÑA, C. (2019): Now you see me. An assessment of the visual recognition and control of individuals in archaeological landscapes, Journal of Archaeological Science, 104: 56-74.
  • FÁBREGAS VALCARCE, R.; RODRÍGUEZ RELLÁN, C. (eds.) (2012a): A arte rupestre no Norte do Barbanza, Andavira Editora, Santiago de Compostela.
  • FÁBREGAS VALCARCE, R.; RODRÍGUEZ RELLÁN, C. (2012b): A media luz. Grabados de la Prehistoria Reciente en abrigos galaicos, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 69 (1): 80-102.
  • FÁBREGAS VALCARCE, R.; RODRÍGUEZ RELLÁN, C. (2012c): A Prehistoria Recente do Barbanza, en R. FÁBREGAS and C. RODRÍGUEZ (eds.), A arte rupestre no Norte do Barbanza, Andavira Editora, Santiago de Compostela: 61-84.
  • FÁBREGAS VALCARCE, R.; RODRÍGUEZ RELLÁN, C. (2015): Walking on the stones of years. Some remarks on the north-west Iberian rock art, en P. SKOGLUND; J. LING and U. BERTILSSON (eds.), Picturing the Bronze Age, Oxbow Books, Oxford: 47-63.
  • FÁBREGAS VALCARCE, R.; RODRÍGUEZ RELLÁN, C.; BUSTELO ABUÍN, J.; BARBEITO POSE, V. (2018): Building up the land: A new appraisal to the megalithic phenomenon in the Barbanza peninsula (Galicia, NW Spain), en J. C. SENNA-MARTINEZ; M. DINIZ and A.F. CARVALHO (eds.), De Gibraltar aos Pirinéus. Megalitismo, Vida e Morte na Fachada Atlântica Peninsular, Fundação Lapa do Lobo, Nelas: 85-98.
  • GAFFNEY, V.; LEUSEN, V. (1995): Postscript—GIS, environmental determinism and archaeology: a parallel text, en G.R. LOCK and Z. STANCIC (eds.), Archaeology and geographic information systems: a European perspective, Taylor and Francis, New York: 367-382.
  • GILLINGS, M.; MATTINGLY, D.J.; DALEN, J. VAN (2000): Geographical information systems and landscape archaeology, Oxbow, Oxford.
  • GRAVEL-MIGUEL, C.; WREN, C.D. (2018): Agent-based least-cost path analysis and the diffusion of Cantabrian Lower Magdalenian engraved scapulae, Journal of Archaeological Science, 99: 1-9.
  • INFANTE, F.; VAQUERO, J.; CRIADO, F. (1992): Vacas, caballos, abrigos y túmulos: definición de una geografía del movimiento para el estudio arqueológico, Cuadernos de Estudios Gallegos, 40 (105): 21-39.
  • INGOLD, T. (1987): The appropriation of nature: essays on human ecology and social relations, University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.
  • LLOBERA, M. (2003): Extending GIS-based visual analysis: the concept of visualscapes, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17 (1): 25-48.
  • LLOBERA, M. (2006): What you see is what you get? Genesis and hierarchy in visualscapes, en T.L. EVANS and P. DALY (eds.), Digital Archaeology. Bridging method and theory, Routledge, Oxford: 132-151.
  • LLOBERA, M. (2007): Reconstructing visual landscapes, World Archaeology, 39 (1): 51-69.
  • LLOBERA, M. (2015): Working the digital: some thoughts from landscape archaeology, en R. CHAPMAN and A. WYLIE (eds.), Material Evidence: Learning from archaeological practice, Routledge, Abingdon: 173-188.
  • OGBURN, D.E. (2006): Assessing the level of visibility of cultural objects in past landscapes, Journal of Archaeological Science, 33: 405-413.
  • PARCERO, C., CRIADO, F.; SANTOS, M. (1998): Rewriting landscape: Incorporating sacred landscapes into cultural traditions, World Archaeology, 30 (1): 159-176.
  • RODRÍGUEZ RELLÁN, C. (2016): Measuring the spatially-related perceptibility of prehistoric rock art, en R. FÁBREGAS; C. RODRÍGUEZ (eds.), Public images, Private readings: multi-perspective approaches to the Post-Palaeolithic rock art. Proceedings of the XVII UISPP World Congress (1-7 September 2014, Burgos, Spain), Archaeopress, Oxford: 41-50.
  • RODRÍGUEZ RELLÁN, C.; FÁBREGAS VALCARCE, R. (2015): Arte rupestre galaica: unha achega dende a estatística espacial e os SIX, Semata. Ciencias Sociais e Humanidades, 27: 9-34.
  • RODRÍGUEZ RELLÁN, C.; VÁZQUEZ MARTÍNEZ, A.; FÁBREGAS VALCARCE, R. (2018): Cifras e imágenes: una aproximación cuantitativa a los petroglifos gallegos, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 75 (1): 109-127.
  • RODRÍGUEZ-RELLÁN, C.; FÁBREGAS VALCARCE, R. (2017): Monuments on the move. Assessing megaliths’ interaction with the NW Iberian landscapes, en M. HINZ (ed.), Megaliths, Societies and Landscapes: Early Monumentality and Social Differentiation in Neolithic Europe, Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, vol. 2: 621-640.
  • ROMANOWSKA, I.; WREN, C.D.; CRABTREE, S.A. (2021): Agent-based modeling for archaeology: simulating the complexity of societies, SFI Press, Santa Fe.
  • STEVENSON, A. (2010): Oxford dictionary of English, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • SWEARER, J. (2011): Visual Angle, en J.S. KREUTZER; J. DELUCA; B. CAPLAN (eds.), Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, Springer, New York: 2626-2627.
  • TILLEY, C. (1996): The powers of rocks: topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor, World Archaeology, 28 (2):161-176.
  • WHEATLEY, D.; GILLINGS, M. (2000): Vision, Perception and GIS: developing enriched approaches to the study of archaeological visibility, en G. LOCK (ed.), Beyond the map. Archaeology and spatial technologies. S.l.: IOS Press, NATO Science Series. Serie A: Life Sciences, 321: 1-27.
  • WILENSKY, U. (1999): NetLogo. S.l.: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Disponible en: https://ccl. northwestern.edu/netlogo.
  • WILENSKY, U.; RAND, W. (2015): An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling. Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.