Factores de riesgo asociados a los testigos de ciberacoso en Educación Primaria

  1. López-Castro, Leticia 1
  2. López-Ratón, Mónica 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Zeitschrift:
Relieve: Revista ELectrónica de Investigación y EValuación Educativa

ISSN: 1134-4032

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Ausgabe: 28

Nummer: 2

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.30827/RELIEVE.V28I2.25905 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Relieve: Revista ELectrónica de Investigación y EValuación Educativa

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Cyberbullying is a harmful and intentional act of an aggressor/s to a victim, through technology, which causes an imbalance of power. The role of bystanders is key for early intervention in the phenomenon. The objective of the study is to detect risk factors associated with cyberbystanders in Primary Education based on individual variables related to the use of technologies (number of technologies, type of technology, frequency, purpose of use, time slot, and place of connection) and experiences as victims or aggressors of cyberbullying. A sample of 1169 families whose children were in 5th or 6th grade of Primary Education was selected and surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire that measures all the indicated variables (α = .84). The study of the risk factors was carried out using binary logistic regression (bivariate models and multivariate model) with the software R version 4.1.0. Bivariate analyses identified: a) using a mobile phone with the Internet, b) Internet connection to talk with friends, c) cybervictimization, and d) cyberperpetration as possible individual risk factors (p < .05). The multivariate model showed joint predictors of the risk of being cyberbystanders in Primary Education: cyberperpetration, cybervictimization, number of technologies used and using the Internet to talk with friends. The interrelation between the roles of cyberbullying and the risk derived from the very frequent use of various technological devices is evidenced. Implications for educational practice are studied.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Álvarez-García, D., & Núñez, J. C., & Dobarro, A., & Rodríguez, C. (2015). Factores de riesgo asociados a cibervictimización en la adolescencia. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(3), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.03.002
  • American Educational Research Association. (2013). Prevention of bullying in schools, colleges, and universities: Research report and recommendations. Author. https://bit.ly/3gutyas
  • Bauman, Z. (2015). Modernidad líquida. Fondo de cultura económica.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press.
  • Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.). (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.001.0001
  • Cox, D.R. (1970). Analysis of Binary Data. Chapman and Hall.
  • Cuberos, R. C., Sánchez, M. C., Campos, G. G., & Ortega, F. Z. (2018). Victimización en la escuela, ocio digital e irritabilidad: análisis mediante ecuaciones estructurales. Relieve: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 24(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.1.12614
  • Domínguez-Alonso, J., Vázquez-Varela, E., & Nuñez-Lois, S. (2017). Cyberbullying escolar: incidencia del teléfono móvil e internet en adolescentes. RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 23(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.23.2.8485
  • Domínguez-Hernández, F., Bonell, L., & González, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of factors that moderate bystanders’ actions in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-1.
  • Epelde-Larrañaga, A., Estrada-Vidal, L.I., & Chacón-Borrego, F. (2022). Factores predictivos en el perfil de los jóvenes que interactúan en una situación de acoso en entornos escolares. European Scientific Journal, 18(5), 117. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2022.v18n5p117
  • Estévez, E., Flores, E., Estévez, J.F., & Huéscar, E. (2019). Programas de intervención en acoso escolar y ciberacoso en educación secundaria con eficacia evaluada: una revisión sistemática. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 51(3), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.8
  • Feijóo, S., Foody, M., O’Higgins, J., Pichel, R., & Rial, A. (2021). Cyberbullies, the cyberbullied, and problematic internet use: Some reasonable similarities. Psicothema, 33(2), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.209
  • Garaigordobil, M. (2015). Ciberbullying en adolescentes y jóvenes del País Vasco: Cambios con la edad. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 31(3), 1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.3.179151
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Oñederra, J. A. (2010). La violencia entre iguales. Revisión teórica y estrategias de intervención. Pirámide.
  • Girón, M., Carabias, M. y Martín, A. (2021). La educación emocional como método preventivo para el acoso escolar en educación infantil: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. REIDOCREA, 10(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.66307
  • González, A. (2016). Factores de riesgo en el ciberacoso: revisión sistemática a partir del modelo del triple riesgo delictivo (TRD). Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, 22, 62–81. https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i22.2971
  • González, V., Prendes, M.P., & López, J.A. (2016). Víctimas de ciberacoso: estudio descriptivo en la Región de Murcia. En R. Roig-Vila (Coord.), Tecnología, innovación e investigación en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje (pp. 1661-1669). Octaedro.
  • Guo, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Psychology in the Schools, 53(4), 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21914
  • Halpern, D., Piña, M., & Ortega-Gunckel, C. (2021). Mediación parental y escolar: uso de tecnologías para potenciar el rendimiento escolar. Educación XX1, 24(2), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.28716
  • Holfeld, B., & Mishna, F. (2018). Longitudinal associations in youth involvement as victimized, bullying, or witnessing cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(4), 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0369
  • Hosmer, D., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R.X. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2022). Porcentaje de menores usuarios de TIC en 2021. https://bit.ly/3RiUuaI
  • Kowalski, R.M., Giumetti, G.W., Schroeder, A.N., & Lattanner, M.R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073-1137. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
  • Lambe, L. J., Hudson, C. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2017). Does defending come with a cost? Examining the psychosocial correlates of defending behaviour among bystanders of bullying in a Canadian sample. Child Abuse and Neglect, 65, 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.012
  • Li, B., & Babu, G.J. (2019). A graduate course on statistical inference. Springer.
  • Machimbarrena, J. M., González-Cabrera, J., Montiel, I., & Ortega-Barón, J. (2021). An Exploratory Analysis of Different Problematic Internet Use Profiles in Cybervictims, Cyberbullies, and Cyberbully Victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(10), 664-672. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0545
  • McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J.A. (1983). Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall.
  • McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). Academic press.
  • McFadden, D. (2021). Quantitative methods for analysing travel behaviour of individuals: some recent developments. In D.A. Hensher and P.R. Stopher (Eds.), Behavioural Travel Modelling (pp. 279-318). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156055-18
  • Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., & Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032
  • Olweus, D. (1991). Victimization among school children. Advances in psychology, 76, 45-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61056-0
  • R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://bit.ly/3AFcE0a
  • Rice, E., Petering, R., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Goldbach, J., Plant, A., Montoya, J., & Kordic, T. (2015). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among middle-school students. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), 66-72. https://doi.org/10.2105%2FAJPH.2014.302393
  • Ruíz-Martín, A., Bono-Cabré, R., & Magallón-Neri, E. (2019). Ciberacoso y ansiedad social en adolescentes: una revisión sistemática. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 6(1), 9–15. http://doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2019.06.1.1
  • Sabater, C., & López, L. (2015). Factores de riesgo en el Ciberbullying. Frecuencia y exposición de los datos personales en Internet. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 4(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4471/rise.2015.01
  • Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000488
  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
  • Sánchez, L., Crespo, G., Aguilar-Moya, R., Bueno-Cañigral, F. J., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., & Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. (2016). Los adolescentes y el ciberacoso. Ayuntamiento de Valencia. https://bit.ly/3Ev2zDo
  • Sittichai, R., & Smith, P.K. (2020). Information Technology Use and Cyberbullying Behavior in South Thailand: A Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197122
  • Smith, P.K. (2019). Research on Cyberbullying: strengths and Limitations. In H. Vandebosch and L. Green (Eds.), Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people (pp. 9-27). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04960-7_2
  • Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
  • Stald, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2012). Twenty-Two: Mobile access: different users, different risks, different consequences?". In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon and A. Görzig (Eds.), Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet (pp. 285-296). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781847428844.ch022
  • Tsimtsiou, Z., Haidich, A. B., Drontsos, A., Dantsi, F., Sekeri, Z., Drosos, E., Trikilis, N., Dardavesis, T., Nanos, P., & Arvanitidou, M. (2018). Pathological Internet use, cyberbullying and mobile phone use in adolescence: a school-based study in Greece. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 30(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2016-0115
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet