Análisis comparado de las herramientas de fact-checking de España y Argentina

  1. Alejandro Ferrández-Mas
  2. Paulo Carlos López-López 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Zeitschrift:
Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Ensayos

ISSN: 1853-3523,  1668-0227

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Titel der Ausgabe: Fake News y desinformación: desafíos para las democracias de América Latina y el Caribe

Nummer: 161

Seiten: 125-139

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.18682/CDC.VI161.6982 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Ensayos

Zusammenfassung

A disseminação de notícias falsas é um fenômeno emergente em nossa socieda-de que coloca em risco elementos tão essenciais quanto a política, a economia e até a saúde pública. Nesse contexto, as ferramentas de verificação de notícias são uma ferramenta muito valiosa para evitar a disseminação de qualquer informação falsa pela mídia ou re-des sociais. A investigação a seguir analisa essas ferramentas nos sistemas de mídia da Espanha e da Argentina, revelando organizações com características bastante semelhantes entre os dois sistemas, transparentes, com um método de verificação argumentativo que é dotado de escalas de verificação para acompanhar o resultado final e com pluralidade em termos de o modelo de projeto que é apresentado em ambos os países.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Adair, B. y Thakore, I. (2015). Factcheking census finds continued groth around the world. Duke Reporter’s Lab. Recuperado de: https://reporterslab.org/fact-checking-censusfinds-growth-around-world/
  • Allcott, H. y Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. https://www.doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  • Amazeen, M. A. (2017). Journalistic interventions. The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking. Journalism, 21(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1464884917730217
  • Amazeen, M. A., Thorson, E., Muddiman, A., & Graves, L. (2015). A Comparison of Correction For- mats: The Effectiveness and Effects of Rating Scale versus Contextual Corrections of Misinformation. American Press Institute. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/The-Effectiveness-of-Rating-Scales.pdf
  • Amorós, M. (2018). Fake News. La verdad de las noticias falsas. Plataforma Editorial.
  • Cárdenas Rica, M. L. (2019). Análisis de las iniciativas de fact-checking en España. Revista Inclusiones, 6(Especial), 62-82.
  • Chan, M. S.; Jones, C. R.; Jamieson, K. H. y Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A Me- taAnalysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1532-1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579
  • Choi, S. (2015). The Two-Step Flow of Communication in Twitter-Based Public Forums. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 696-711. https://www.doi. org/10.1177/0894439314556599
  • Currie-Sivek, S. y Bloyd-Peshkin, S. (2018). Where Do Facts Matter? Journalism Practice, 12(4), 400-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1307694
  • Duke Reporter’s Lab. (2022). Fact-Checking. Duke Reporter’s Lab. https://reporterslab.org/fact-checking/
  • Elizabeth, J. (2014). Who are you calling a fact checker? American Press Institute. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/fact-checking-project/fact-checker-definition/
  • Graves, L. & Cherubini, F. (2016). The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe. Reuters Institute Digital News Report, 1-40. Recuperado de: https://bit.ly/2U7xZqw
  • López-López, P.C., Lagares Díez, N. & Puentes Rivera, I. (2021). La inteligencia artificial contra la desinformación: una visión desde la comunicación política. Razón Y Palabra, 25(112), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.26807/rp.v25i112.1891
  • López Pan, F. y Rodríguez Rodríguez, J. (2020). El Fact Checking en España. Plataformas, prácticas y rasgos distintivos. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 26(3), 1045-1065.
  • Marietta, M. y Barker, D. (2019). One Nation, Two Realities. Dueling Facys in American Democracy. Oxford University Press.
  • Martin, N. (2017). Journalism, the pressures of verification and notions of post-truth in civil society. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 41-56. https://www.doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v9i2.5476
  • Nyhan, B.; Porter, E.; Reifler, J. y Wood, T. J. (2020). Taking Fact-checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability. Political Behavior, 42, 936-960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x
  • Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
  • Palau-Sampio, D. (2018). Fact-checking y vigilancia del poder: La verificación del discurso público en los nuevos medios de América Latina. Communication & Society, 31(3), 347-365.
  • Redondo, M. (2018). Verificación digital para periodistas Manual contra bulos y desinformación internacional. UOC.
  • Shin, J. y Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan Selective Sharing: The Biased Diffusion of Factchecking Messages on Social Media. Journal of Comunication, 67(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284
  • Stencel, M. (2016, febrero 16). Global Fact-Checking up 50% in Past Year. Duke Reporter’s Lab. https://reporterslab.org/global-fact-checking-up-50-percent/
  • Vizoso, A. & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2019). Plataformas de fact-checking en español. Características, organización y método. Comunication & Society, 32(1), 127-144.
  • Wintersieck, A. L. (2017). Debating the Truth: The Impact of Fact-Checking During Electoral Debates. American Politics Research, 45(2), 304-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X16686555
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet