What a transparent Romance language with a Germanic gender-determiner mapping tells us about gender retrievalInsights from European Portuguese

Bibliographic References

• Adamson, L., & Šereikaitė, M. (2019) Representing gender and defaults: Evidence from Lithuanian. Glossa: A journal of General Linguistics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.860
• Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition, 82, 179–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00158-5
• Ayora, P., Peressotti, F., Alario, F.-X., Mulatti, C., Pluchino, P., Job, R., & Dell’Acqua, R. (2011). What phonological facilitation tells about semantic interference: A dual-task study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00057
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
• Barreña, A. (1997). Desarrollo diferenciado de sistemas gramaticales en un niño vascoespañol bilingüe, en W. R. Glass & A. T. Pérez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish (pp. 55-74). Cascadilla Press & Pennsylvania State University.
• Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D’Amico, S., & Hernandez, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(6), 847–847. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206800
• Bates, D., Maechler, M, Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
• Bi, Y., Wei, T., Janssen, N., & Han, Z. (2009). The contribution of orthography to spoken word production: evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 555–560. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.555
• Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T. (2008). Grammatical gender in speech production: Evidence from Czech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-007-9060-0
• Boutonnet, B., Athanasopoulos, P., & Thierry, G. (2012). Unconscious effects of grammatical gender during object categorisation. Brain Research, 1479, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.044
• Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 26(2), 211–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Tanaka, M. (2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003
• Bürki, A., Sadat, J., Dubarry, A.-S., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). Sequential processing during noun phrase production. Cognition, 146, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.002
• Bürki, A., Besana, T., Degiorgi, G., Gilbert, R., & Alario, F. -X. (2020). Representation and selection of determiners with phonological variants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(7), 1287–1315. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000643
• Caffarra, S., & Barber, H. A. (2015). Does the ending matter? The role of gender-to-ending consistency in sentence reading. Brain Research, 1605, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.018
• Caffarra, S., Janssen, N., & Barber, H. A. (2014). Two sides of gender: ERP evidence for the presence of two routes during gender agreement processing. Neuropsychologia, 63, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.016
• Caffarra, S., Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Pesciarelli, F., Vespignani, F., & Cacciari, C. (2015). Is the noun ending a cue to grammatical gender processing? An ERP study on sentences in Italian. Psychophysiology, 52(8), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12429
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How Many Levels of Processing Are There in Lexical Access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432997381664
• Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the “tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon. Cognition, 64(3), 309–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00031-0
• Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N., & Alario, F.-X. (2001). A Cross-linguistic Investigation of Determiner Production. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 209–226). MIT Press.
• Casado, A., Palma, A., & Paolieri, D. (2021). The scope of grammatical gender in Spanish: Transference to the conceptual level. Acta Psychologica, 218, 103361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103361
• Casado, A., Palma, A., & Paolieri, D. (2018). The Influence of Sex Information on Gender Word Processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 557–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9546-3
• Corbett, G. G. (2013). Number of Genders. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/30, Accessed on 2021-09-28).
• Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344
• Corrêa, L. M. S., Augusto, M. R. A., & Castro, A. (2011). Agreement and markedness in the ascription of gender to novel animate nouns by children acquiring Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 10(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.103
• Costa, A., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The gender congruity effect: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386275
• Cubelli, R., Lotto, L., Paolieri, D., Girelli, M., & Job, R. (2005). Grammatical gender is selected in bare noun production: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.007
• Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(4), 313–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969008407066
• Finocchiaro, C., Alario, F. X., Schiller, N. O., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2011). Gender congruency goes Europe: A cross-linguistic study of the gender congruency effect in Romance and Germanic languages. Rivista di Linguistica, 23(2), 161–198.
• Fodor, I. (1959). The origin of grammatical gender. Lingua, 8. 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(59)90020-8
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, 35(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195503
• Foucart, A., Branigan, H. P., & Bard, E. G. (2010). Determiner selection in romance languages: Evidence from French. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(6), 1414–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020432
• Gollan, T. H., & Frost, R. (2001). Two routes to grammatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(6), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014235223566
• Guasch, M., Boada, R., Ferré, P., & Sánchez-Casas, R. (2013). NIM: A web-based Swiss army knife to select stimuli for psycholinguistic studies. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0296-8
• Harris, J. (1991). The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(1), 27–62.
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42(2), 113–157. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2000.0744
• Heim, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Friederici, A. D., & Amunts, K. (2009). Left cytoarchitectonic area 44 supports selection in the mental lexicon during language production. Brain Structure and Function, 213(4-5), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-009-0213-9
• Heim, S., Friederici, A. D., Schiller, N. O., Rüschemeyer, S. A., & Amunts, K. (2009). The determiner congruency effect in language production investigated with functional MRI. Human brain mapping, 30(3), 928–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20556
• Ibrahim, M. H. (1973). Grammatical Gender: Its Origin and Development. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110905397
• Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., & Lemhöfer, K. (2014). Selection of freestanding and bound gender-marking morphemes in speech production: A review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(6), 684–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.654645
• Kilarski, M. (2005). On grammatical gender as an arbitrary and redundant category. In D. A. Kibbee (Ed.), History of Linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the Tenth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHOLS X), 1–5 September 2005, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois (pp. 24-36). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.112.03kil
• Kuchenbrandt, I. (2008). Cross-linguistic influences in the acquisition of grammatical gender? Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit, 86, 1–28.
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
• La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboorsde, E. (1998). The gender-congruency effect in picture word task. Psychological Research, 61(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050026
• Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
• McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (1996). Functional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring. Brain, 119(Pt. 3), 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.3.907
• Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: results from picture–word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0026
• Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1146–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1146
• Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 907–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00531-4
• Miozzo, M., Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The absence of a gender congruency effect in romance languages: A matter of stimulus onset asynchrony? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(2), 388–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.388
• New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(42), 16598–16603. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703913104
• O'Rourke, P. (2007). The gender congruency effect in bare noun production in Spanish. Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics, Linguistic Theory at the University of Arizona, 15, 66–89.
• Paolieri, D., Lotto, L., Morales, L., Bajo, T., Cubelli, R., & Job, R. (2010). Grammatical gender processing in romance languages: Evidence from bare noun production in Italian and Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440902916803
• Paolieri, D., Lotto, L., Leoncini, D., Cubelli, R., & Job, R. (2011). Differential effects of grammatical gender and gender inflection in bare noun production. The British Psychological Society, 102(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1342/000712610X496536
• Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates D. M. (2000). Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag.
• Protopapas, A. (2007). Check Vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192979
• Roelofs, A. (2004). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111(2), 573–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.561
• Roelofs, A. (2008). Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.353
• Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997). Cognition, 69(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00056-0
• Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2015). Aspects of competition in word production: reply to Mahon and Navarrete. Cortex, 64, 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.016
• Sá-Leite, A. R., Fraga, I., & Comesaña, M. (2019). Grammatical gender processing in bilinguals: An analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1148–1173. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01596-8
• Sá-Leite, A. R., Haro, J., Comesaña, M., & Fraga, I. (2021). Of beavers and tables: The role of animacy in the processing of grammatical gender within a picture-word interference task. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661175
• Sá-Leite, A. R., Luna, K., Fraga, I., & Comesaña, M. (2020). The gender congruency effect across languages in bilinguals: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(4), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01702-w
• Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00508-9
• Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Grammatical gender selection and the representation of morphemes: The production of Dutch diminutives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7-8), 945–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600824344
• Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 841–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.841
• Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (2000). Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1368–1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1368
• Soares, A. P., Costa, A. S., Machado, J., Comesaña, M., & Oliveira, H. (2017). The Minho Word Pool: Norms for imageability, concreteness and subjective frequency for 3,800 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0767-4
• Soares, A. P., Iriarte, A., Almeida, J. J., Simões, A., Costa, A., Machado, J., França, P., Comesaña, M., Rauber, A., Rato, A., & Perea, M. (2018). Procura-PALavras (P-PAL): A web-based interface for a new European Portuguese lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1461–1481. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1058-z
• Soares, A. P., Machado, J., Costa, A., Iriarte, Á., Simões, A., de Almeida, J. J., Comesaña, M., & Perea, M. (2015). On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.964271
• Starreveld, P., & La Heij, W. (2004). Phonological facilitation of grammatical gender retrieval. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(6), 677–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000061
• Szekely, A., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Federmeier, K., Herron, D., Iyer, G., Jacobsen, T., Arévalo, A., Vargha, A., & Bates, E. (2005). Timed action and object naming. Cortex, 41(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70174-6
• Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., Lu, C. C., Pechmann, T., Pléh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Gutierrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K., Mehotcheva, T., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Tzeng, A., ... & Bates, E. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002
• Van Berkum, J. J. A. (1997). Syntactic processes in speech production: The retrieval of grammatical gender. Cognition, 64(2), 115–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00026-7
• Vasishth, S. & Gelman, A. (2021). How to embrace variation and accept uncertainty in linguistic and psycholinguistic data analysis. Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zcf8s
• Velnić, M. (2020) Acquisition of a transparent gender system: A comparison of Italian and Croatian. Frontiers, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571674
• Vigliocco, G., Lauer, M., Damian, M., & Levelt, W. J. (2002). Semantic and syntactic forces in noun phrase production. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 28(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.46
• Wilshire, C., Singh, S., & Tattersall, C. (2016). Serial order in word form retrieval: New insights from the auditory picture–word interference task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0882-8