Cambio de estado y movimiento: resultativos en griego antiguo

  1. Mercedes Díaz de Cerio 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Libro:
Forum classicorum: perspectivas y avances sobre el Mundo Clásico
  1. Jesús de la Villa Polo (coord.)
  2. Antonio López Fonseca (coord.)
  3. Emma Falque Rey (coord.)
  4. María Paz de Hoz García-Bellido (coord.)
  5. María José Muñoz Jiménez (coord.)
  6. Irene Villarroel Fernández (coord.)
  7. Victoria Recio Muñoz (coord.)

Editorial: Guillermo Escolar ; Sociedad Española de Estudios Clásicos

ISBN: 978-84-18981-15-9 978-84-18981-13-5 978-84-09-34326-3 978-84-09-34325-6 978-84-18981-14-2 978-84-09-34322-5 978-84-09-34327-0 978-84-09-34323-2

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 1

Páginas: 327-335

Congreso: Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Estudios Clásicos (15. 2019. Valladolid)

Tipo: Aportación congreso

Resumen

Descriptive grammars of Ancient Greek (AG) classify resultative adjectives as a specific class of secondary predicates; in sheer contrast, the latest studies on AG syntax do not address resultative adjectives as a topic, notwithstanding the attention devoted to resultative constructions in the aftermath of Talmy (1991)’ s typological hypothesis. This hypothesis links the behaviour of motion constructions (as a means to express a change of location) and resultative constructions (as a means to express a change of state). As AG data were surveyed from the standpoint of the typological hypothesis, resultative constructions were eventually concluded to be non-existent in AG (Horrocks-Stavrou, 2007; Acedo-Matellán, 2016). To account for such opposite views, a reappraisal of the core difference between resultative and resultative construction is here put forward; at the same time, further classifications of resultative constructions (such as «strong» vs. «weak» as well as «simple» vs. «complex » structures) are taken into account. This approach allows a re-evaluation of AG data: those constructions traditionally labelled as «resultative» are shown to be a non-homogeneous group, made up of a noticeably larger set of weak resultative constructions, along with a small, distinct group of structures which meet the requirements to be held as strong resultative constructions.