Spanish Adaptation of the Subjective Value Inventory

  1. Enrique Lorenzo Lago 1
  2. José Francisco Morales Domínguez 2
  3. José Manuel Sabucedo Cameselle 1
  4. María Gloria Seoane Pesqueira 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915,  1886-144X

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 32

Issue: 3

Pages: 437-443

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2020.7 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Antecedentes: diferentes estudios han destacado la importancia de los resultados subjetivos en las negociaciones. El Subjective Value Inventory (SVI) es el único instrumento para medir este aspecto. El objetivo de esta investigación fue analizar las propiedades psicométricas y la invarianza factorial de género del SVI en una muestra española. Método: se realizó la doble traducción de la herramienta original y luego se aplicó a una muestra de 345 universitarios y profesionales de ambos géneros. Se realizaron análisis de validez factorial, de fiabilidad y de invarianza factorial del modelo en relación al género. Todos los factores del modelo, excepto el Self, mostraron unos índices psicométricos adecuados. La invarianza configural en relación al género es aceptable. Resultados: se confirmó un modelo de dieciséis ítems agrupados en cuatro factores, equivalente al original. Conclusiones: la versión española del SVI se ajusta a la escala original. Sin embargo, en este estudio se propone utilizar la escala sin el factor Self. Finalmente, la escala muestra invarianza configural en relación al género.

Bibliographic References

  • Aiken, L. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
  • Allport, G.W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. Yale University Press.
  • Alzate, M., Durán, M., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2009). Población civil y transformación constructiva de un conflicto armado interno: aplicación al caso colombiano [Civilian population and constructive transformation of an internal armed conflict: An application to the Colombian case]. Universitas Psychologica, 8(3), 703-720.
  • Becker, W. J., & Curhan, J. R. (2018). The dark side of subjective value in sequential negotiations: The mediating role of pride and anger. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000253
  • Calderón, C., Navarro, D., Lorenzo, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2019). Multidimensional or essentially unidimensional? A multi-faceted factor-analytic approach for assessing the dimensionality of tests and items. Psicothema, 31(4), 450-457. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2019.153
  • Charter, R. A. (2003). A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and the clinical implications of low reliability. Journal of General Psychology, 130(3), 290-304. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00221300309601160
  • Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Eisenkraft, N. (2010). The objective value of subjective value: A multi-round negotiation study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(3), 690-709. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1559-1816.2010.00593.x
  • Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Xu, H. (2006). What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 493- 512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.493
  • De Dreu, C.K.W. (1997). Productive conflict: The importance of conflict management and confl ict issue. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 9-22). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217016.n2
  • Drolet, A. L., & Morris, M. W. (2000). Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(1), 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1395
  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From Alpha to Omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi. org/10.1111/bjop.12046
  • Elosua, P. (2005). Evaluación progresiva de la invarianza factorial entre las versiones original y adaptada de una escala de autoconcepto [Progressive way in strict factorial invariance]. Psicothema, 17(2), 356-362.
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología [Factor analysis as a research technique in psychology]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33.
  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.
  • Fornell, C., & Lacker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. http://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  • Honeth, A. (1997). La lucha por el reconocimiento: por una gramática moral de los conflictos sociales [The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts]. Crítica.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8. User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International.
  • Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/ 9781452226576
  • Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The manager as negotiator: Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. Free Press.
  • Lewicki, R., Saunders, D. M., Barry, B., & Minton, J. W. (2004). Essentials of negotiation (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Lewis, B., Olekalns, M., Smith, P., & Caza, B. (2018). See the benefit: Adversity appraisal and subjective value in negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 34(4), 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12243
  • Lindner, E. (2006). Making enemies: Humiliation and international conflict. Praeger Security International. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223 433070440020710
  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. https://doi. org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
  • Malhotra, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Psychological influence in negotiation: An introduction long overdue. Journal of Management, 34(3), 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316060
  • Mazei, J., Hüffmeier, J., Freund, P. A., Stuhlmacher, A., Bilke, L., & Hertel, G. (2015). A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038184
  • Medina, F. J., & Munduate, L. (2009). Gestión del confl icto, negociación y mediación [Conflict management, negotiation, and mediation]. Pirámide.
  • Medina, F. J., Munduate, L., Dorado, M. A., Martínez, I., & Guerra, J. M. (2005). Types of intragroup conflict and affective reactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3-4), 219-230. https://doi. org/10.1108/02683940510589019
  • Morales, J. F. (1999). Naturaleza y tipos de conflictos [Types of conflicts and their nature]. In J. F. Morales & S. Yubero (Eds.), El grupo y sus conflictos (pp. 11-24). Universidad de Castilla La Mancha.
  • Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición [International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition]. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2013.24
  • Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Diez pasos para la construcción de un test [Ten steps for test development]. Psicothema, 31(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291
  • Nash, J. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 21(1), 128-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906951
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Achieving integrative agreements. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 35-49). Sage Publications.
  • Putnam, L. L., & Poole, M. S. (1992). Conflict and negotiation. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 549-599). Sage Publications.
  • Redorta, J. (2007). Aprender a resolver conflictos [Learning to solve confl icts]. Paidós.
  • Sakhrani, V. A. (2016). The Objective Value of Subjective Value in project design negotiations. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 6(2-4), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2016.1268123
  • Schermeller-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Suárez-Alvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30(2), 149-158. https://doi. org/10.7334/psicothema2018.33
  • Thompson, L. L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 515- 532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515
  • Thompson, L. L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 98- 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90048-E
  • Thompson, L. L. (2005). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Thompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010) Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 491-515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. psych.093008.100458
  • Tomé-Lourido, D., Arce, C., & Ponte, D. (2018). Adaptation of the Test of Performance Strategies Competition Subscale to Spanish. Psicothema, 30(1), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.124
  • Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behaviour: Theoretical Frontiers. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780203776049
  • Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231
  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. (1981). Teoría de la comunicación humana [Pragmatics of human communication]. Herder.
Data source: Dialnet