Teoría e Interpretación en la Arqueología de la Muerte

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alfayé, S. (2009): “Sit tibi terra gravis: Magical-ritual Practices against Restless Dead in the Ancient World”, en F. Marco, F. Pina y J. Remesal (eds.), Formae mortis. El tránsito de la Vida a la Muerte en las Sociedades Antiguas: 181-216. Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona.
• Alfayé, S. (2010): “Nails for the Dead: A Polysemic Account of an Ancient Funerary Practice”, en R. L. Gordon y F. Marco Simón (eds.), Magical Practice in the Latin West: 427-456. Leiden, Brill.
• Alfayé, S. (2011): Imagen y ritual en la Céltica peninsular. A Coruña, Toxosoutos.
• Appadurai, A. (1986): “Introduction: commodities and the politics of value”, en A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in cultural perspective: 3-63. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Bailey, G. (2007): “Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26: 198-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002
• Bapty, I. y Yates, T. (eds.) (1990): Archaeology after structuralism. London, Routledge.
• Barrett, J.C. (1987): “Contextual Archaeology”. Antiquity 61: 468-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00073087
• Barrett, J.C. (1988): “The living the dead and the ancestors: Neolithic and Early Bronze Age mortuary practices», en J.C. Barrett y I. A. Kinnes (eds.), The Archaeology of Context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: Recent Trends: 30-4. Sheffield, J.R. Collis Publications.
• Barrett, J.C. (1994): Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford, Blackwell.
• Barrett, J.C. (2001): “Agency, the duality of structure, and the problem of the archaeological record”, en I. Hodder (ed.), Archaeological Theory Today: 140-164. Oxford, Polity.
• Barrett, J. y Fewster, J. (2000): “Intimacy and structural transformation: Giddens and Archaeology”, en C. Holtorf y H. Karlsson (eds.), Philosophy and archaeological practice: 25-38. Göteborg, Bricoleur Press.
• Bazelmans, J. (2000): “Beyond Power: Ceremonial Exchanges in Beowulf”, en F. Theuws y J. L. Nelson (eds.), Rituals of Power from Late Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages: 311-75. Leiden, Brill.
• Bazelmans, J. (2002): “Moralities of Dress and the Dress of the Dead in Early Medieval Europe”, en Y. Hamilakis, M. Pluciennik y S. Tarlow (eds.), Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality: 71-84. New York, Springer.
• Becker, E. (1973): The denial of death. New York, Free Press.
• Belcastro, M.G. y Ortalli, J. (curs.) (2010): Sepolture anomale. Indagini archaeologiche e antropologiche dall’epoca classica al Medioevo in Emilia Romagna. Bologna, All’Insegna del Giglio.
• Bender, B. (1998): Stonehenge: Making Space. Oxford, Berg.
• Berggren, A. y Nilsson Stutz, L. (2010): “From spectator to critic and participant: A new role for archaeology in ritual studies”. Journal of Social Archaeology 10 (2): 171-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605310365039
• Binford, L. (1971): “Mortuary Practices: their Study and their Potential”, en J. A. Brown (ed.), Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices: 6-29. Washington, Society for American Archaeology.
• Binford, L. (1977): “Introduction”, en L. Binford (ed.), For Theory Building in Archaeology: 1-10. New York, Academic Press Inc.
• Bird-David, N. (1999): “Animism revisited: personhood, environment and relational epistemology”. Current Anthropology 40: 67-79.
• Boivin, N. (2004): “From veneration to exploitation: human engagement with the mineral world”, en N. Boivin y M. A. Owoc (eds.), Soils, stones and symbols: cultural perceptions of the mineral world: 165-186. London, Psychology Press.
• Boivin, N. (2008): Material Cultures, material minds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Boivin, N. y Owoc, A. (eds.) (2004): Soils, stones and symbols: cultural perceptions of the mineral world. London, Psychology Press.
• Boric, D. (2002): “Apotropaism and the Temporality of Colours: Colourful Mesolithic-neolithic Seasons in the Danube Gorges”, en A. Jones y G. MacGregor (eds.), Colouring the Past: The Significance of Colour in Archaeological Research: 23-44. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Boric, D. (2003): “Deep time metaphor: mnemonic and apotropaic practices at Lepenski Vir”. Journal of Social Archaeology 3(1): 46-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605303003001098
• Borric, D. (ed.) (2010): Archaeology and Memory. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Boric, D. y Robb, J. (eds.) (2008): Past Bodies: Body-Centered Research in Archaeology. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Bourdieu, P. (1977): Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Bradley, R. (1989): “Darkness and light in the design of megalithic tombs”. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 8: 251-259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0092.1989.tb00205.x
• Bradley, R. (1993): Altering the Earth: the origins of monuments in Britain and continental Europe. Edinburgh, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.
• Bradley, R. (1998): The significance of monuments. London, Routledge.
• Bradley, R. (2000): An Archaeology of Natural Places. London, Routledge.
• Bradley, R (2000a): “Death and the regeneration of life: a new interpretation of house urns in Northern Europe”. Antiquity 76: 372-377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00090463
• Bradley, R. (2002b): The past in prehistoric societies. London, Routledge.
• Bradley, R. (2009): Image and audience: rethinking prehistoric art. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Brown, J. (1995): “On Mortuary Analysis with Special Reference to the Saxe-Binford Research Program”, en L. A. Beck (ed.), Regional Approaches to Mortuary Analysis: 3-26. New York, Springer.
• Brown, J. A. (ed.) (1971): Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices. Washington, Society for American Archaeology.
• Brück, J. (2001): “Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7: 649-668. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.00082
• Brück, J. (2006): “Material metaphors. The relational construction of identity in Early Bronze Age burials in Ireland and Britain”. Journal of Social Archaeology 4 (3): 307-333. DOI: 10.1177/1469605304046417
• Buchli, V. (2002): “Introduction”, en V. Buchli (ed.), The material culture reader: 1‐22. Oxford, Berg.
• Budja, M. (2010): “The archaeology of death from social personae to relational personhood”. Documenta Praehistorica XXXVII: 43-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/dp.37.4
• Busby, C. (1997): “Permeable and partible persons: A Comparative Analysis of Gender and Body in South India and Melanesia”. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute 3: 261-278. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3035019
• Butler, J. (1993): Bodies that Matter: on discursive limits of sex. New York, Routledge.
• Carsten, J. (2004): After Kinship. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Casella, E.C. y Fowler, C. (2005): The archaeology of plural and changing identities: beyond identification. New York, Springer.
• Chapa Brunet, T. (1991): “La Arqueología de la Muerte: planteamientos, problemas y resultados”, en D. Vaquerizo Gil (coord.), Arqueología de la Muerte: Metodología y perspectivas actuales: 13-38. Córdoba, Excma. Diputación Provincial de Córdoba.
• Chapa Brunet, T. (2006): “Arqueología de la Muerte: Aspectos metodológicos”. Anales de Arqueología Cordobesa 17: 25-46.
• Chapman, J. (2000a): Fragmentation in Archeology, People, places and broken objects in the prehistory of southeastern Europe. London, Routledge.
• Chapman, J. (2000b): Tensions at Funerals: Micro-Transition Analysisin Later Hungarian Prehistory. Budapest, Archaeolingua.
• Chapman, J. y Gaydarska, B. (2007): Parts and wholes: fragmentation in prehistoric context. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Chapman, R. (1981): “The emergence of formal disposal areas and the ‘problem’ of megalithic tombs in prehistoric Europe”, en R. Chapman, I. Kinnes y J. Randsborg (eds.), The Archaeology of Death: 71-82. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Chapman, R. (2003): Archaeologies of Complexity. London, Routledge.
• Chapman, R.; Kinnes, I. y Randsborg, K. (eds.) (1991): The archaeology of Death. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Chapman, R. y Randsborg, K. (1981): “Approaches to the Archaeology of Death”, en R. Chapman, I. Kinnes y K. Randsborg (eds.), The archaeology of Death: 1-24. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Charlier, P. (2009): Male mort. Morts violentes dans l’Antiquité. Paris, Fayard.
• Childe, V. G. (1929): The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
• Childe, V. G. (1940): Prehistoric Communities of the British Isles. London, W. & R. Chambers.
• Cochrane, A. (2005): “A taste for the unexpected: subverting mentalite´s through the motifs and settings of Irish passage tombs”, en D. Hofmann, J. Mills, y A. Cochrane (eds.), Elements of Being: Mentalite´s, Identities and Movement: 5-19. Oxford, British Archaeological Reports Oxford.
• Cochrane, A. (2006): “The simulacra and simulations of Irish Neolithic passage tombs”, en I. Russell (ed.), Images, Representations and Heritage: Moving Beyond a Modern Approach in Archaeology: 251-282. New York, Springer.
• Cochrane, A. (2007): “We have never been material”, en J. Thomas y V. O. Jorge (eds.), Overcoming the modern invention of material culture (Proceedings of the TAG session. Exeter 2006): 137-158. Porto, ADECAP.
• Dawson, W. R. (1928): “Mummification in Australia and in America”. Journal Royal Anthropological Society of Great Britain and Ireland 58: 115-138.
• Descola, P. (1992): “Societies in nature and the nature of society”, en A. Kuper (ed.), Conceptualizing Society: 107-126. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Dobres, M.-A. y Robb, J. E. (eds.) (2000): Agency in Archaeology. London, Routledge.
• Dobres, M.-A. y Robb, J. E. (2005): “Doing agency: introductory remarks on methodology”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12: 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-005-6926-z
• Dornan, J. L. (2002): “Agency and archaeology: past, present and future directions”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9: 303-329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021318432161
• Douglas, M. (1966): Purity and danger. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London, Routledge
• Dowd, M. y Hensey, R. (eds.) (2016), The Archaeology of Darkness. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Dronfield, J. (1995): “Subjective Vision and the Source of Irish Megalithic Art”. Antiquity 69: 539-549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00081928
• ----- (1996): “Entering alternative realities: cognition, art and architecture in Irish passage tombs”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6 (1): 37-72.
• Eckardt, H. y Williams, H. (2003): “Objects without a past?”, en H. Williams (ed.), Archaeologies of remembrance:141-170. New York, Springer.
• Edmonds, M. (1995): Stone Tools and Society. London, Batsford.
• Edmonds, M. (1999): Ancestral Geographies of the Neolithic. London, Routledge.
• Eliade, M. (1960): El Chamanismo y las técnicas arcaicas del éxtasis. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
• Fahlander, F. (2003): The materiality of serial practice: a microarchaeology of burial. Göteborg, Göteborg University.
• Fahlander, F. (2008): “A Piece of the Mesolithic Horizontal Stratigraphy and Bodily Manipulations at Skateholm”, en F. Fahlander y T. Oestigaard (eds.), The Materiality of Death: Bodies, Burials, Beliefs: 29-46. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Ferrer Albelda, E.; Lozano, F. y Mazuelos, J. (coords.) (2009): Salvación, infierno y olvido. Escatología en el mundo antiguo. Spal Monografías XIV. Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla.
• Fisher, G. D. y Loren P. (2003): “Embodying Identity in Archaeology”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 13 (2): 225-230. DOI: 10.1017/S0959774303210143
• Flannery, K. V. (1967): “Culture history versus culture process: A debate in American Archaeology”. Scientific American 217: 119-122.
• Fleming, A. (1973): “Tombs for the living”. Man 8: 177-193.
• Foucault, M. (2000): Vigilar y Castigar. Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva.
• Fowler, C. (2000): “The individual, the subject, and archaeological interpretation: reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler”, en C. Holtorf y H. Karlsson (eds.), Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century: 107-33. Gothenburg, Bricoleur Press.
• Fowler, C. (2002): “Body parts: personhood and materiality in the earlier Manx Neolithic”, en Y. Hamilakis, M. Pluciennik y S. Tarlow (eds.), Thinking Through the Body: Archaeologies of corporeality: 47-69. New York, Springer.
• Fowler, C. (2004): The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. London, Routledge.
• Fowler, C. (2007): “Landscape and personhood”, en B. David y J. Thomas (eds.), Handbook of Landscape Archaeology: 291‐299. California, Left Coast Press.
• Fowler, C. (2008): “Fractal bodies in the past and present”, en D. Boric y J. Robb (eds.), Past Bodies: Body-Centred Research in Archaeology: 47‐57. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Fowler, C. (2010): “Relational personhood as a subject of anthropology and archaeology: comparative and complementary analyses”, en D. Garrow y T. Yarrow (eds.), Archaeology and anthropology: understanding similitary, exploring difference: 137-159. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Frazer, J. G. (1886): “On certain burial customs as illustrate of the primitive theory of the soul”. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 15: 64-104.
• Freud, S. (1967): Tótem y tabú. Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
• Gadamer, H-G. (1977): Verdad y método. Salamanca, Ediciones Sígueme.
• García Sanjuán, L. y Wheatley, D.W. (2010): “Natural substances, landscape forms, symbols and funerary monuments: elements of cultural memory among the Neolithic and Copper Age societies of southern Spain”, en T. Lillios y V. Tsamis (eds.), Material Mnemonics: everyday memory in prehistoric Europe: 10-39. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Gardner, A. (2004): Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power and Being Human. London, University College London Institute of Archaeology Publications.
• Garrow, D. y Yarrow, T. (eds.) (2010): Archaeology and anthropology: understanding similitary, exploring difference. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Gell, A. (1992): “The technology of enchantment and the enchatment of technology”, en J. Coote y A. Shelton (eds.), Anthropology, art and aesthetics: 40-67. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
• Gell, A. (1998): Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Giddens, A. (1979): Central Problems in Social Theory. Oakland, University of California Press.
• Gillespie, S. D. (2001): “Personhood, agency, and mortuary ritual: A case study from the Ancient Maya”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20: 73-112. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.2000.0369
• Gimbutas, M. (1974): The Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe. Oakland, University of California Press.
• Goldstein, L. G. (1976): Spatial Structure and Social Organization: Regional Manifestations of Mississippian Society. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
• Goldstein, L. (1981): “One-dimensional archaeology and multi-dimensional people: spatial organization and mortuary analysis”, en R. Chapman, I. Kinnes y K. Randsborg (eds.), The Archaeology of Death: 53-69. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Goodenough, W. H. (1965): “Rethinking ‘status’ and ‘role’: toward a general model of the cultural organization of social relationships”, en M. Banton (ed.), The relevance of models for social anthropology: 1-24. London, Travistoek.
• Gosden, C. (1994): Social Being and Time. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Gosden, C. (1999): Anthropology and Archaeology: A Changing Perspective. London, Routledge.
• Gosden, C. (2001): “Making Sense: Archaeology and Aesthetics”. World Archaeology 32 (2): 163-167.
• Gosden, C. (2004): “Aesthetics, Intelligence and Emotions”, en E. DeMarrais, C. Renfrew y C. Gosden (eds.), Rethinking Materiality: 33‐40. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Gosden, C. (2005): “What do objects Want?”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12: 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x
• Gosden, C. (2008): “Social ontologies”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 363: 2003-2010. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0013
• Gosden, C. y Lock, G. (1998): “Prehistoric histories”. World Archaeology 30: 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1998.9980393
• Gosden, C. y Marshall, Y. (1999): “The Cultural biography of objects”. World Archaeology 31 (2): 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439
• Gowland, R. (2004): “The Social Identity of Health in Late Roman Britain”, en B. Croxford, H. Eckardt, J. Meade y J. Weekes (eds.), TRAC 2003: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference: 135-46. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Graham, E. J. (2009): “Becoming persons, becoming ancestors: personhood, memory and the corpse in Roman rituals of social remembrance”. Archaeological Dialogues 16 (1): 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203809002803
• Guerrero, E.; Molist, M.; Kuijt, I. y Anfruns, J. (2009): “Seated Memory: New Insights into Near Eastern Neolithic Mortuary Variability from Tell Halula, Syria”. Current Anthropology 50 (3): 379-391. DOI: 10.1086/598211
• Hallam, E. y Hockey, J. L. (2001): Death, Memory and Material Culture. Oxford, Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Hamerow, H. (1994): “Migration Theory and the Migration Period”, en B. Vyner (ed.), Building on the Past: 164-167. London, Royal Archaeological Institute.
• Hamilakis, Y.; Pluciennik, M. y Tarlow, S. (2002): Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. New York, Springer.
• Harland, R. (1987): Superstructuralism: The Philosophy of Structuralism and Post-Structuralism. London, Anybook Ltd.
• Harvey, G. (2005): Animism: Respecting the Living World. New York, Columbia University Press.
• Hertz, R. (1960) [1907]: Death and the Right Hand. New York, Free Press.
• Hill, J. y Gunn, J. (eds.) (1977): The individual in prehistory: studies of variability in style in prehistoric technologies. New York, Academic Press.
• Hodder, I. (1982a): Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Hodder, I. (1982b): “Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view”, en I. Hodder (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology: 1-16. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Hodder, I. (1984): “Burials, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic”, en D. Miller y C. Tilley (eds.), Ideology, Power and Prehistory: 51-68. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Hodder, I. (1986): Reading the Past. Current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Hodder, I. (1987a): “The contextual analysis of symbolic meanings”, en I. Hodder (ed.), The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings: 1-10. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Hodder, I. (1987b): “The Meaning of Discard: Ash and Domestic Space in Baringo”, en S. Kent (ed.), Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach: 424-448. New York, Columbia University Press.
• Hodder, I. (1989): “This is not an article about material culture as text”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 250-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(89)90015-9
• Hodder, I. (1990): The domestication of Europe: structure and contingence in Neolithic societies. Oxford, Blackwell.
• Hodder, I. (1991): “Interpretive archaeology and its role”. American Antiquity 56: 7-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/280968
• Hofmann, D. y Bickle, P. (2011): “Culture, Tradition and the Settlement Burials of the Linearbandkeramik (LBK) Culture”, en B.W. Roberts y M.V. Linden (eds.), Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission: 183-201. London, Springer.
• Hollimon, S. (1997): “The third gender in native California: Two-spirit undertakers among the Chumash and their neighbors”, en C. Claassen y R. A. Joyce (eds.), Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica: 173-188. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Hollimon, S. (2006): “The Archaeology of non-binary genders in Native North America”, en S. Milledge Nelson (ed.), Handbook of gender in archaeology: 435-450. Lanham, AltaMira Press.
• Holtorf, C. (1996): “Towards a Chronology of Megaliths: Understanding Monumental Time and Cultural Memory”. Journal of European Archaeology 4: 119-152. https://doi.org/10.1179/096576696800688051
• Holtorf, C. (1998): “The life-history of megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany)”. World Archaeology 30: 23‐38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1998.9980395
• Holtorf, C. (2008): “The Past is Now –an Interview with Anders Högberg”. European Journal of Archaeology 11 (1): 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957108101238
• Holtorf, C. y Williams, H. (2006): “Landscapes and memories”, en D. Hicks y M. Beaudray (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology: 235-254. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Homans, G. C. (1941): “Anxiety and ritual: the theories of Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown”. American Anthropologist 43: 164-172. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1941.43.2.02a00020
• Hoskins, J. (1989): “On Losing and Getting a Head: Warfare, Alliance and Exchange in a Changing Sumba 1888-1988”. American Ethnologist 16 (3): 419-440. DOI: 10.1525/ae.1989.16.3.02a00010
• Hoskins, J. (1998): Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People’s Lives. London, Routledge.
• Hoskins, M.E. (2005): “Unquiet Graves: Burial Practices of the Roman Corinthians”, en N. D. Schowalter y S. J. Friesen (eds.), Urban Religion in Roman Corinth: Interdisciplinary Approaches: 249-280. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Howes, D. (2006): “Scent, sound and synaesthesia: intersensoriality and material culture theory”, en C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands y P. Spyer (eds.), Handbook of material culture: 161-172. London, Sage.
• Hutington, R. y Metcalf, P. (1991): Celebrations of death: the anthropology of mortuary ritual. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Ingold, T. (1993): “The temporality of landscape”. World Archaeology 25 (2): 152-174. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235
• Ingold, T. (2007): “Materials against materiality”. Archaeological Dialogues 14 (1): 1-16. DOI:10.1017/S1380203807002127
• James, E. O. (1928): “Cremation and the preservation of the dead in North America”. American Anthropologist 30: 214-242. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1928.30.2.02a00030
• Jay, M. (2003a): “El ascenso de la hermenéutica y la crisis del ocularcentrismo”, en M. Jay, Campos de Fuerza. Entre la historia intelectual y la crítica cultural: 195-220. Buenos Aires, Paidós.
• Jay, M. (2003b): “Ideología y ocularcentrismo: ¿hay algo tras el azogue del espejo?”, en M. Jay, Campos de Fuerza. Entre la historia intelectual y la crítica cultural: 253-272. Buenos Aires, Paidós.
• Johnson, M. (1989): “Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X
• Johnston, S. I. (1999): Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. Berkeley, University of California Press.
• Jones, A. (2002): “A biography of colour: colour, material histories and personhood in the early Bronze Age of Britain and Ireland”, en A. Jones y G. MacGregor (eds.), Colouring the Past: 159-74. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Jones, A. (2003): “Technologies of remembrance”, en H. Williams (ed.), Archaeologies of remembrance: death and memory in past societies: 65-88. New York, Springer.
• Jones, A. (2005a): “Between a rock and a hard place: rock art and mimesis in Neolithic and Bronze Age Scotland”, en V. Cummings y A. Pannett (eds.), Set in Stone: New Approaches to Neolithic Monuments in Scotland: 107-117. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Jones, A. (2005b): “Matter and memory: colour, remembrance and the Neolithic/Bronze Age transition”, en E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden y C. Renfrew, C. (eds.), Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world: 167-178. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Jones, A. (2006): “Animated Images: images, agency and landscape in Kilmartin, Argyll, Scotland”. Journal of Material Culture 11 (1-2): 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506063023
• Jones, A. (2007): Memory and Material Culture. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Jones, A. (2010): “Burning matters: memory, violence and monumentality in the British Neolithic”, en T. Lillios y V. Tsamis (eds.), Material Mnemonics: everyday memory in prehistoric Europe: 85-102. Oxford, Oxbow
• Jones, A. y MacGregor, G. (2002): Colouring the past: the significance of colour in archaeological research. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Jones. S. (1997): The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London, Routledge.
• Joyce, R.A. (2005): “Archaeology of the Body”. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729
• Katz, D. (2007): “Sumerian Funerary Rituals in Context”, en N. Laneri (ed.), Performing Death Social Analyses of Funerary: Traditions in the ancient near east and Mediterranean: 167-189. Chicago, University of Chicago.
• Kinnes, I. (1975): “Monumental function in British Neolithic burial practices”. World Archaeology 7: 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1975.9979618
• Kirk, T. (2006): “Materiality, personhood and monumentality in Early Neolithic Britain”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16 (3): 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774306000205
• Knapp, A. B. y Meskell, L. (1997): “Bodies of evidence in prehistoric Cyprus”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7 (2): 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001931
• Knapp, A. B. y van Dommelen, P. (2008): “Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18 (1): 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000024
• Knappett, C. (2005): Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. Pennsylvania, Browse Penn Press.
• Knappett, C. y L. Malafouris (eds.) (2008): Material Agency: Towards a Non Anthropocentric Approach. New York, Springer.
• Koppytoff, I. (1986): “The cultural biography of things: commoditization perspective”, en Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in cultural perspective: 64-91. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Kroeber, A. L. (1927): “Disposal of the dead”. American Anthropologist 293: 308-315. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1927.29.3.02a00090
• Küchler, S. y Miller, D. (2005): Clothing as material culture. Oxford, Berg.
• Küchler, S. y Were, G. (2005): The art of clothing: a Pacific experience. London, Routledge.
• Kuijt, I. (2008): “The Regeneration of Life: Neolithic structures of symbolic remembering and forgetting”. Current Anthropology 49(2): 171-197. DOI: 10.1086/526097
• Lally, M. y Ardren, T. (2008): “Little Artefacts: Rethinking the constitution of the archaeological infant”. Childhood in the Past 1: 62-77. DOI: 10.1179/cip.2009.1.1.62
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962): Totemism. London, Merlin Press.
• Lewis-Williams, D. y Pearce, D. (2005): Inside the Neolithic Mind. London, Thames & Hudson.
• Lewis-Williams, D. y Dowson, T. (1988): “The signs of all times: entoptic phenomena in Upper Palaeolithic art”. Current Anthropology 29: 201-45.
• Lifton, R. J. y Olson, E. (1974): Living and dying. London, Praeger.
• Lillios, K. T. (2008): Heraldry for de death: memory, identity and the engraved stone plaques of Neolithic Iberia. Austin, University of Texas Press.
• ----- (2010): “Mnemonic practices of the Iberian Neolithic: the production and use of the engraved slate plaque-relics”, en T. Lillios y V. Tsamis (eds.), Material Mnemonics: everyday memory in prehistoric Europe: 40-72. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Lillios, T. y Tsamis, V. (2010): Material mnemonics: everyday memory in prehistoric Europe. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Lock, G. (2009): “Human activity in a spatial context”, en B. Cunliffe, C. Gosden y R. A. Joyce (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Archaeology: 169-188. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Lubbock, J. (1882): The origin of civilization and the primitive condition of man. London, D. Appleton.
• Lubbock, J. (1900): Prehistoric times. London, Williams and Norgate.
• Lucas, G. (2005): Archaeology of Time. London, Routledge.
• Madsen, T. y Jensen, H. J. (1982): “Settlement and land use in early neolithic Denmark”. Analecta Praehistorice Liedensia 15: 63-86. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/28082
• Matthews, S. G. (2004a): “Gesture, gender, ethnicity: The instantiated communities of Bronze Age Europe”. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 19 (2): 56-72.
• Matthews, S. G. (2004b): “The Instantiated Identity: Critical Approaches to Studying Gesture and Material Culture”, en ‘The Materialisation of Social Identities’, session at the annual Theoretical Archaeology Group conference, University of Glasgow, Scotland. Diciembre 2004: 17-19.
• Mauss, M. (1938): “Une catégorie de l’esprit humain: la notion de personne, celle de ‘moi’”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 68: 263-281.
• Mauss, M. (1990): The Gift. London, Routledge.
• McGuire, R. H. (1982): “The study of ethnicity in historical archaeology”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(82)90019-8
• McGuire, R. H. (1992): A Marxist Archaeology. Orlando, Academic Press.
• Meskell, L. (1998b): “The irresistible body and the seduction of archaeology”, en D. Montserrat (ed.), Changing Bodies, Changing Meanings: Studies on the Human Body in Antiquity: 139‐161. London, Routledge.
• Meskell, L. (1996): “The somatisation of archaeology: Discourses, institutions, corporeality”. Norwegian Archaeological Review 29: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.1996.9965595
• Meskell, L. (2004): Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. London, Berg.
• Meskell, L. (ed.) (2005): Archaeologies of Materiality. Oxford, Blackwell.
• Miller, D. (1987): Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Blackwell.
• Miller, D. (ed.) (2005): Materiality. London, Duke University Press.
• Miller, D. y Tilley, C. (eds.): Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Mills, B. J. y Walker, W. H. (eds.) (2008): Memory Work: Archaeologies of Material Practices. Santa Fe, SAR press.
• Montelius, G. O. A. (1903): Die Typologische Methode. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wicksell.
• Moore, H. (1994): A passion for Difference. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Morris, I. (1991): “The archaeology of ancestors: the Saxe/Goldstein hypothesis revisited”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1(2): 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300000330
• Munn, N. D. (1986): The fame of Gawa. A symbolic study of value transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guniea). London, Duke University Press.
• Murphy E. (ed.) (2008): Deviant Burial in the Archaeological record. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Nakamura, C. (2005): “Mastering matters: Magical sense and apotropaic figurine worlds of Neo-Assyria”, en L. Meskell (ed.), Archaeologies of materiality: 18-45. Oxford, Blackwell.
• Nelson (ed.): Handbook of Gender in Archaeology: 435-450. Lanham, AltaMira Press.
• Nilsson Stutz, L. (2003): Embodied Rituals and Ritualized Bodies. Tracing ritual practices in late Mesolithic mortuary practices. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell International.
• Oestigaard, T. (2005): Death and Life-Giving Waters. Cremation, Caste, and Cosmogony in Karmic Traditions. Oxford, Archaeopress.
• Olivier, L. (1999): “The Hochdorf “princely” grave and the question of the nature of archaeological funerary assemblages”, en T. Murray (ed.), Time and Archaeology: 109‐138. London, Routledge.
• Olsen, B. (2003): “Material culture after text: re-membering things”. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36 (3): 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650
• Olsen, B. (2010): In Defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham, AltaMira Press.
• Oppenheimer, S. (2006): The Origins of the British. London, Robinson Publishing.
• Orme, B. (1981): Anthropology for archaeologists. London, Duckworth London.
• Osborne, R. y Tanner, J. (2007): Art´s Agency and art History. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.
• O’Shea, J. M. (1984): Mortuary Variability: An Archaeological Investigation. London, Academic Press.
• Parker Pearson, M. (1982): “Mortuary practices, society and ideology: ethnoarchaeological study”, en I. Hodder (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology: 99-113. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
• Parker Pearson, M. (1992): “Tombs and monumentality in southern Madagascar: preliminary results of the central Androy survey”. Antiquity 66: 941-948. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00044860
• Parker Pearson, M. (1999): The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Stroud, Sutton
• Parker Pearson, M. y Ramilisonina, M. (1998): “Stonehenge for the Ancestors: The Stones Pass on the Message”. Antiquity 72 (276): 308-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00086592
• Peebles, C. y Kus, S. M. (1977): “Some archaeological correlates of ranked societies”. American Antiquity 42: 421-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719803200103
• Peirce, C.S. (1931-35, 1958): Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1-6. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
• Perry, E. M. y Joyce, R. A. (2001): “Providing a Past for ‘Bodies that matter’: Judith Butler´s Impact on the Archaeology of Gender”. International Journal of sexuality and Gender Studies 6 (1-2): 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010142023744
• Persson A. W. (1940): New tombs at Dendra. Lund, Harrassowitz.
• Piggott, S. (1938): “The Early Bronze Age in Wessex”. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 4: 52-106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00021137
• Piggott, S. (1965): Ancient Europe. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
• Pinney, C. (2006): “Four types of visual culture”, en C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands y P. Spyer (eds.), Handbook of material culture: 131-144. London, Sage.
• Preucel, R.W. (2006): Archaeological semiotics. Oxford, Blackwell.
• Preucel, R. W. y Bauer, A.A. (2001): “Archaeological pragmatics”. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34: 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650127469
• Proudfoot, E. V. W. (1963): “Report on the excavation of a bell barrow in the parish of Edondsham, Dorset, England, 1959”. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 29: 395-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00015450
• Raab, L. M. y Goodyear, A. C. (1984): “Middle-Range Theory in Archaeology: A Critical Review of Origins and Applications”. American Antiquity 2: 255-268. https://doi.org/10.2307/280018
• Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1922): The Andaman Islanders. Cambridge, Cambridge Universety Press.
• Rakita, G.F.M.; Buikstra, J. E.; Beck, L. A. y Williams, S. R. (eds.) (2005): Interacting with the Dead. Perspectives on Mortuary Archaeology for the New Millennium. Florida, University Press of Florida.
• Rebay-Salisbury, K.; Stig, M.L. y Hughes, J. (eds.), Body Parts and Bodies Whole. Changing relations and meanings. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Renfrew, A.C. (1973): Before Civilization: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe. Londres, Pimlico.
• Renfrew, C. (1974): “Space, time and polity”, en M. J. Rowlands and J. Friedman (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems: 89-114. London, University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Renfrew, C. (1976): “Megaliths, territories and populations”, en S. De Laet (ed.), Acculturation and continuity in Atlantic Europe: 198-220. Brujas, De Tempel.
• Reybrouck, D. V. (2000): “Beyond ethnoarchaeology? A critical history on the role of ethnographic analogy in contextual and post-processual archaeology”, en A. Gramsch (ed.), Vergleichen als archäologische Methode-Analogien in den Archäologien: 39-51. Oxford, Archaeopress.
• Reynolds, A. (2009): Anglo-Saxon Deviant Burial Customs. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Richardson, S. (2007): “Death and Dismemberment in Mesopotamia: Discorporation between the Body and Body Politic”, en N. Laneri (ed.), Performing Death Social Analyses of Funerary: traditions in the ancient near east and Mediterranean: 189-208. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
• Robb, J. (2002): “Time and Biography: Osteobiography of the Italian Neolithic Lifespan”, en Y. Hamilakis, M. Pluciennik y S. Tarlow (eds.), Thinking through the Body: 153-172. New York, Springer.
• Robb, J. (2007): “Burial treatment as transformations of bodily ideology”, en N. Laneri (ed.), Performing Death Social Analyses of Funerary: Traditions in the ancient near east and Mediterranean: 297-288. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
• Robb, J. (2010): “Beyond agency”. World Archaeology 42 (4): 493-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2010.520856
• Robben, A.C.G.M. (ed.) (2004): Death, Mourning, and Burial: A Cross-Cultural Reader. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.
• Roberts, B. W. y Linden, M.V. (2011): “Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission”, en B. W. Roberts y M. V. Linden (eds.), Investigating Archaeological Cultures Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission: 1-22. New York, Springer
• Rose, H. J. (1922): “Celestial and terrestrial orientation of the dead”. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 52: 127-140. DOI: 10.2307/2843774
• Rowe, J. H. (1962): “Worsaae’s Law and the Use of Grave Lots for Archaeological Dating”. American Antiquity 28 (4): 129-137. https://doi.org/10.2307/278369
• Rowlands, M. y Tilley, C. (2006): “Monuments and memorials”, en C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands y P. Spyer (eds.), Handbook of material culture. London: 500-515.
• Saxe, A. (1970): Social dimensions of mortuary practices. Ann Arbor, Univ. Microfilms.
• Saxe, A. (1971): “Social dimensions of mortuary practices in a Mesolithic population from Wadi Halfa, Sudan”, en J. A. Brown (ed.), Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices: 39-57. Washington, Society for American Archaeology.
• Scarre, C. (2000): Monuments and Landscape in Atlantic Europe: Perception and society during the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age. London, Routledge.
• Scarre, C. (2004): “Choosing stones, remembering places: geology and intention in the megalithic monuments of Western Europe”, en N. Boivin y M-A. Owoc (eds.), Soils, Stones and Symbols. Cultural Perceptions of the Mineral World: 187-202. London, UCL Press.
• Scarre, C. (2008): “Shrines of the land and places of power: religion and the transition to farming in Western Europe”, en D. S. Whitley y K. W. Hays-Gilpin (eds.), Belief in the Past. Theoretical approaches to the archaeology of religion: 209-226. California, Left Coast Press.
• Scarre, C. (2009): “Stony ground: outcrops, rocks and quarries in the creation of megalithic monuments”, en C. Scarre (ed.), Megalithic Quarrying: Sourcing, extracting and manipulating the stones: 3-20. Oxford, British Archaeological Reports.
• Sergent, B. (1995): Les Indo-Européens. Histoire, langues, mythes. Paris, Payot.
• Service, E. (1962): Primitive social organization. New York, Random House.
• Shanks, M. y Tilley, C. (1982): “Ideology, Symbolic Power and Ritual Communication: A Reinterpretation of Neolithic Mortuary Practices”, en I. Hodder (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology: 129-54. Cambridge.
• Shanks, M. y Tilley, C. (1987a): Re-Constructing Archaeology. Cambridge University Press.
• Shanks, M. y Tilley, C. (1987b): Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge, Cambirdge University Press.
• Shay, T. (1985): “Differentiated treatment of deviancy at death as revealed in anthropological and archaeological material”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4: 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(85)90004-2
• Shennan, S. (1975): “The social organization at Branc”. Antiquity 49: 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00070319
• Sørensen, M. L.S. (1991): “Gender construction through appearance”, en D. Walde y N. D. Willows (eds.), The Archaeology of Gender: 121‐129. Calgary, University of Calgary Archaeological Association.
• Sørensen, M. L.S. (1997): “Reading Dress: the construction of social categories and identities in Bronze Age Europe”. Journal of European Archaeology 5: 93‐114. https://doi.org/10.1179/096576697800703656
• Sørensen, M. L.S. (2000): Gender Archaeology. Cambridge, Polity Press.
• Spriggs, M. (2008): “Ethnographic parallels and the denial of history”. World Archaeology 40 (4): 538-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240802453161
• Stevens, F. (2007): “Identifying the Body: Representing Self. Art, Ornamentation and the Body in Later Prehistoric Europe”, en J. Sofaer (ed.), Material Identities: 82-98. Oxford, Blackwell.
• Sthrathern, M. (1981): “Self-interest and the social good: some implications of Hagen gender Imagery”, en S. Orthner y H. Whitehead (eds.), Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality: 166-191. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Sthrathern, M. (1988): The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, University of California Press.
• Stringer, M.D. (1999): “Rethinking animism: thoughts from the infancy of our discipline”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5 (4): 541-555.
• Tainer, J. A. (1975): “Social inference and mortuary practices: an experiment in numerical classification”. World Archaeology 7 (1): 1-15.
• Tainer, J. A. (1977): “Modelling change in prehistoric social systems”, en L. Binford (ed.), For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic Resources, Spatial Analysis, and Systemic Modeling. New York: 327-352.
• Tainer, J. A. (1978): “Mortuary practices and the study of prehistoric social systems”. Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 105-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-003101-6.50010-X
• Tarlow, S. (1999): Bereavement and Commemoration: An Archaeology of Mortality. Oxford, Blackwell.
• Tarlow, S. y Nilsson-Stuz, L. (eds.) (2013): The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Dead and Burial. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Taylor, T. (2002): The Buried Soul: How Humans Invented Death. London, Fourth Estate.
• Thomas, J. (1996): Time, Culture and Identity. An Interpretative Archaeology. London, Routledge.
• Thomas, J. (1999): Understanding the Neolithic. London, Routledge.
• Thomas, J. (2000): “Death, identity and the body in Neolithic Britain”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 603-17. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.00038
• Thomas, J. (2002): “Archaeology’s humanism and the materiality of the body”, en Y. Hamilakis, M. Pluciennik y S. Tarlow (eds.), Thinking Through the Body: Archaeologies of corporeality: 29-46. New York, Springer.
• Thomas, J. (2004): Archaeology and Modernity. London, Routledge.
• Tilley, C. (1993): “Interpretation and a poetics of the past”, en C. Tilley (ed.), Interpreting Archaeology: 1-27. Oxford, Berg.
• Tilley, C. (1994): A Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford, Berg.
• Tilley, C. (1996): “The power of rocks: topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor”. World archaeology 28: 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1996.9980338
• Tilley, C. (1999): Metaphor and Material Culture. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.
• Tilley, C. (2004): The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape phenomenology. Oxford, Berg.
• Tilley, C. (2006): “Objetification”, en C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands y P. Spyer, Handbook of Material Culture: 60-74. Oxford, Sage.
• Tilley, C. (2007): “Architectural Order and the Ordening of Imagery in Malta and Ireland: A Comparative perspective”, en D. A. Barrowclough y C. Malone (eds.), Cult in Context: reconsidering ritual in archaeology: 118-134. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Tilley, C. (2008): Body and image: explorations in landscape phenomenology 2. Oxford, Routledge.
• Tilley, C. y W. Bennett (2001): “An archaeology of supernatural places: the case of West Penwith”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7: 335-362. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.00066
• Treherne, P. (1995): “The Warrior´s Beauty: The Masculine Body and Self-Identity in Bronze Age Europe”. Journal of European Archaeology 3: 105-144. https://doi.org/10.1179/096576695800688269
• Turner, T. (1993): “The social skin”, en C. B. Burroughs y J. Ehrenreich (eds.), Reading the social body: 15-39. Iowa, University of Iowa Press
• Tyler, J. M. (1921): The new stone age of northern Europe. New York, C. Scribner’s sons
• Tylor, E. B. (1871): Primitive culture. London, Harper.
• Ucko, P.J. (1969): “Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains”. World Archaeology 1 (2): 262-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1969.9979444
• Van Gennep, A. (2008): Los ritos de paso. Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
• Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998): “Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3): 469-88. DOI: 10.2307/3034157
• Viveiros de Castro, E. (2004): “Perspectivismo y multiculturalismo en la América indígena”, en A. Surrallés y P. García Hierro (eds.), Tierra adentro: territorio indígena y percepción del entorno: 37‐82. Lima, AIBR.
• Wagner, R. (1991): “The fractal person in Big Men and Great Men”, en M. Godelier y M. Strathern (eds.), Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia: 159-173. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Waterman, S. (1990): “Discourse and Domination: Michel Foucault and the problem of Ideology”, en I. Bapty y T. Yates (eds.), Archaeology after structuralism: 79-102. London, Routledge.
• Watson, A. (2001): “The sounds of transformation: acoustics, monuments and ritual in the British Neolithic”, en N. Price (ed.), The Archaeology of Shamanism: 187-92. London, Routledge.
• Watson, A. (2006): “(Un)intentional sound? Acoustics and Neolithic monumenta”, en C. Scarre y G. Lawson (eds.), Archaeoacoustics: 11-22. Cambridge, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
• Watson, A. y Keating, D. (1999): “Architecture and sound: an acoustic analysis of megalithic monuments in prehistoric Britain”. Antiquity 73: 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00088281
• Watson, A. y Keating, D. (2000): “The architecture of sound in Neolithic Orkney”, en A. Ritchie (ed.), Neolithic Orkney in its European Context: 259-263. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Watts, C. (2008): “On Mediation and Material Agency in the Peircean Semiotic”, en C. Knappett y L. Malafouris (eds.), Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach: 187‐208.New York, Springer.
• Watts, C. (ed.) (2013): Relational Archaeologies. Human, animal, things. London, Routledge.
• Weiner, A. (1992): Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-while-Giving. Berkeley, University of California Press.
• Wells, P. (2008): Image and Response in Early Europe. Bristol, Bristol Classical Press.
• Whitley, J. (2002): “Objects with Attitude. Biographical facts and fallacies in the study of late bronze age and early iron age warrior graves”. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 12 (2): 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774302000112
• Whitley, J. (2002): “Too Many Ancestors”. Antiquity 76: 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00089870
• Whittle, A. (1997): “Moving on and moving around: Neolithic settlement mobility”, en P. Topping (ed.), Neolithic Landscapes: 14-22. Oxford, Oxbow.
• Wilder, H. H. y Whipple, R. W. (1917): “The position of the body in aboriginal interments in western Massachusetts”. American Anthropologist 19: 372-387. doi:10.1525/aa.1917.19.3.02a00030
• Williams, H. (2001): “An Ideology of Transformation: Cremation Rites and Animal Sacrifice in Early Anglo-Saxon England”, en N. Price (ed.), The Archaeology of Shamanism: 193-212. London, Routledge.
• Williams, H. (ed.) (2003): Archaeologies of remembrance: death and memory in past societies. New York, Springer.
• Williams, H. (2006): Death and Memory in Early Medieval Britain. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Williams, H. (2011): “The sense of being seen: ocular effects at Sutton Hoo”. Journal of Social Archaeology 11(1): 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605310381034
• Wilson, P. (1988): The domestication of human species. New Haven, Yale University Press.
• Winter, I. J. (2007): “Agency Marked, Agency Ascribed: The Affective Object in Ancient Mesopotamia”, en R. Osborne y J. Tanner (eds.), Art´s Agency and art History: 42‐69. Oxford, Blackwell.
• Witmore, C. L. (2006): “Vision, Media, Noise and the Percolation of Time: Symmetrical approaches to the mediation of the material world”. Journal of Material Culture 11(3): 267-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506068806
• Wundt, W. (1911): Völkerpsychologie. Leipzig, Leipz Press.
• Yarrow, H. C. (1880): Introduction to the study of mortuary customs among the North American Indians. Washington, Govt. Print. Off.
• Yates, T. (1990): “Archaeology through the Looking-Glass”, en I. Bapty y T. Yates (eds.), Archaeology after Structuralism: 127-153. London, Routledge.
• Yates, T. y Nordbladh, J. (1990): “This Perfect Body, this Virgin text: Between Sex and Gender in Archaeology”, en I. Bapty y T. Yates (eds.), Archaeology after Structuralism: 222‐239. London, Routledge.