Short communication. Behavioural activities of two dairy cow genotypes (Holstein-Friesian vs. Jersey x Holstein-Friesian) in two milk production systems (grazing vs. confinement)

  1. Roca Fernández, Ana Isabel
  2. Ferris, Conrad Patrick
  3. González Rodríguez, Antonio
Revista:
Spanish journal of agricultural research

ISSN: 1695-971X,  2171-9292

Ano de publicación: 2013

Volume: 11

Número: 1

Páxinas: 120-126

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5424/SJAR/2013111-2682 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Spanish journal of agricultural research

Resumo

The aim of this work was to study the behavioural activities of two cow genotypes, Holstein-Friesian (HF) vs. Jersey × Holstein-Friesian (Jx), when managed within two production systems, a low inputs grazing (G) system vs. a high inputs confinement (C) system. Eighty spring calving cows (HF, n = 40 and Jx, n = 40), from AFBI Hillsborough (Northern Ireland) experimental dairy cattle, were randomly assigned to one of two production systems (G, n = 40 and C, n = 40) in a block design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of four treatments (HF-G, HF-C, Jx-G and Jx-C). Cow behavioural activities (feeding, lying, standing and ruminating) were registered on three periods at 20-min intervals, between 16.00-22.00 h and 07.00-14.00 h. Average milk yields (kg cow�1 day�1) were higher (p < 0.001) in the C system (27.0) than in the G system (20.1), with differences (p < 0.001) between the two cow genotypes (HF, 25.1 vs. Jx, 22.0 kg cow�1 day�1). Milk production system showed an effect on cow behavioural activities. Animals on the G system spent more time (p < 0.001) grazing (522 min) than those on the C system spent feeding (173 min). Cows on the C system spent more time (p < 0.001) lying (C, 411 vs. G, 212 min), standing (C, 236 vs. G, 85 min) and ruminating (C, 244 vs. G, 141 min) than those on the G system. There were differences between periods for time spent lying (p < 0.001), feeding (p < 0.05) and ruminating (p < 0.001), while time spent standing did not differ between periods. Cow genotype had no effect on any of the behavioural activities.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • DeVries TJ, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Beauchemin KA, 2005. Frequency of feed delivery affects the behaviour of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 88: 3553-3562.http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73040-X 
  • Dillon P, Berry DP, Evans RD, Buckley F, Horan B, 2006. Consequences of genetic selection for increased milk production in European seasonal pasture based systems of milk production. Livest Sci 99: 141-158.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.06.011 
  • Drissler M, Gaworski M, Tucker CB, Weary DM, 2005. Freestall maintenance: effects on lying behavior of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 88: 2381-2387.http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72916-7 
  • Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G, 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 72: 68-78.http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0 
  • Ferris CP, Vance ER, Elliot C, Kilpatrick D 2011. Comparison of the performance of two cow genotypes within a total confinement and low input grazing system. Final Report for AgriSearch (Project D-45-08). Agri-Food and Bioscience Institute, Agriculture Branch, Hillsborough, County Down, Northern Ireland. 101 pp. Available in http://www.agrisearch.org/dairy/completed-dairy/genetics-dairy-completed/158-comparison-of-the-performance-of-two-cow-genotypes-within-a-low-input-grazing-system-and-a-high-input-total-confinement-system-d-45-08 [3 August 2012]. 
  • Grant RJ, Albright JL, 2000. Feeding behaviour. In: Farm animal metabolism and nutrition (Mello JPFD, ed.). CABI Publ, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. pp: 365-382.http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851993782.0365PMid:10935041  
  • Grant RJ, Albright JL, 2001. Effect of animal grouping on feeding behavior and intake of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 84 (E-Suppl): 156-163. 
  • Heins BJ, Hansen LB, Seykora AJ, 2006. Production of pure Holstein vs. crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. J Dairy Sci 89: 2799-2804.http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72356-6 O'Connell J, Giller PS, Meaney W, 1989. A comparison of dairy cattle behavioral patterns at pasture and during confinement. Ir J Agric Res 28: 65-72. 
  • Peyraud JL, Van den Pol-Van Dasselaar A, Dillon P, Delaby L, 2010. Producing milk from grazing to reconcile economic and environmental performances. Grass Sci Eur 15: 865-890. 
  • Roca-Fernández AI, O'Donovan M, Curran J, González-Rodríguez A, 2011. Effect of pre-grazing herbage mass and daily herbage allowance on perennial ryegrass swards structure, pasture dry matter intake and milk performance of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Span J Agric Res 9(1): 86-99. 
  • Roca-Fernández AI, González-Rodríguez A, Vázquez-Yáñez OP, 2012. Effect of pasture allowance and cows' lactation stage on perennial ryegrass sward quality, pasture dry matter intake and milk performance of Holstein-Friesian cows. Span J Agric Res 10(2): 393-408.http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012102-123-11 
  • Tucker CB, Weary DM, 2004. Bedding on geotextile mattresses: how much is needed to improve cow comfort? J Dairy Sci 87: 2889-2895.http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73419-0
Fonte de datos: Dialnet