Los sistemas silvoarables modernos en España

  1. J. Coello 1
  2. I. Urbán 2
  3. M.R. Mosquera-Losada 3
  1. 1 Consorci Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya
  2. 2 Bosques Naturales, S.A.
  3. 3 Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Cuadernos de la Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales

ISSN: 1575-2410,  2386-8368

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 44

Pages: 19-38

Type: Article

DOI: 10.31167/CSEFV0I44.17550 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de la Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The presence of woody vegetation inside and on the margins of agricultural fields was relatively common in Spain until the development of the mechanization of agricultural tasks from the middle of the 20th century. The process of simplifying in agricultural ecosystems and the segregation of forest areas and agricultural areas continued during the following decades, supported by a policy focused on maximizing the continuity of the cultivated areas. However, in recent years there is a body of evidence of the productive and environmental interest (ecosystem services) of recovering the woody component in the environment of cultivated land, without compromising the mechanization of agricultural ecosystems management and avoiding or mitigating a large part of the problems associated to monocultures. At European level, and particularly in France, there is a growing number of experiences that allow to know the technical requirements and advantages of the systems combined tree and agricultural production, known as silvoarable or alley cropping systems. In Spain, these systems have been used traditionally in the dehesa, but they are very scarce in other areas, due to the lack of knowledge and of specific support policies. The incipient silvoarable experiences established in recent years have valuable broadleaved species as the prevalent tree component. This paper presents a summary of the main silvoarable experiences established in our country, as well as some opportunities for their promotion.

Bibliographic References

  • Buttoud, G., 2013. Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3182e.pdf . Accessed. 26 October 2017.
  • Coello, J., Baiges, T., Cervera, T., Alcoverro, F., 2015. Plantacions agroforestals de noguera i freixe amb cultius herbacis. Un sistema productiu innovador amb interès ambiental. In : Tusell, J.M., Vericat, P. (eds.), XXXII Jornades Tècniques Silvícoles Emili Garolera. Consorci Forestal de Catalunya. Santa Coloma de Farners, pp. 60-71.
  • Colomb, V., 2009. Potential for agroforestry alley-cropping with valuable broadleaves in Central Catalonia. Tesis de Máster. Universitat de Lleida.
  • Court of Auditors, 2016. Cross-compliance: Commission cannot ensure system is effective, warn EU Auditors. http://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/News/NEWS1610_27/INSR_CROSS_COMPLIANCE_EN.pdf . Accessed. 26 October 2017.
  • Dupraz, C., Burgess, P., Gavaland, A., Graves, A., Herzog, F., Incoll, L., Jackson, N., Keesman, K., Lawson, G., Lecomte, I., Liagre, F., Mantzanas, K., Mayus, M., Moreno, G., Palma, J., Papanastasis, V.P., Paris, P., Pilbeam, D., Reisner, Y., van der Werf, W., 2005. Synthesis of the Silvoarable Agroforestry For Europe project. INRA-UMR System Editions, Montpellier.
  • Dupraz, C., Liagre, F., 2008. Agroforesterie: des arbres et des cultures. France Agricole Editions, Paris.
  • Eichhorn, M.P., Paris, P., Herzog, F., Incoll, L.D., Liagre, F., Mantzanas, K., Mayus, M., Moreno, G., Papanastasis, V.P., Pilbeam, D.J., Pisanelli, A., Dupraz, C., 2006. Silvoarable systems in Europe – Past, present and future prospects. Agroforest. Syst. 67, 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-1111-7
  • Graves, A.R., Burgess, P.J., Palma, J., Herzog, F., Moreno, G., Bertomeu, M., Dupraz, C., Liagre, F., Koffeman, A., van den Briel, J., 2005. Deliverable 7.3 Report on plot economics of European silvoarable systems and Deliverable 8.2 Economic feasibility of silvoarable agroforestry in target regions report. SAFE project. http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/safe/english/results/final-report/D7-3%208-2.pdf . Accessed. 20 June 2016.
  • Graves, A.R., Burgess, P.J., Palma, J.H.N., Herzog, F., Moreno, G., Bertomeu, M., Dupraz, C., Liagre, F., Keesman, K., van der Werf, W., de Nooy, A.K., van den Briel, J.P., 2007. Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries. Ecol. Eng. 29, 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.018
  • Herder den, M., Burgess, P.J., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., Herzog, F., Hartel, T., Upson, M., Viholainen, I., Rosati, A., 2015. Preliminary stratification and quantification of agroforestry in Europe. Milestone Report 1.1 for EU FP7 AGFORWARD Research Project (613520). http://www.agforward.eu/index.php/en/preliminary-stratification-and-quantification-of-agroforestry-in-europe.html. Accessed. 27 June 2016.
  • Herzog, F., 1998. Streuobst: a traditional agroforestry system as a model for agroforestry development in temperate Europe. Agroforest. Syst. 42, 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006152127824
  • Izac, A.M.N., Sánchez, P.A., 2001. Towards a natural resource management paradigm for international agriculture: the example of agroforestry research. Agr. Syst. 69(1-2), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00015-4
  • Jose, S., 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforest. Syst. 76, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7
  • Lawson, G., Balaguer, F., Palma, J.H.N., Papanastasis, V., 2016. Options for agroforestry in the CAP 2014-2020. https://euraf.isa.utl.pt/files/pub/docs/policyupdates_1_lawson.pdf. Accessed. 26 October 2017.
  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, 2008. Diagnóstico de las Dehesas Ibéricas Mediterráneas, Tomo I. Madrid.
  • Miguel de, E., Pointereau, P., Steiner, C., 2000. Los árboles en el espacio agrario. Importancia hidrológica y ecológica. Banco Santander Central Hispano. Madrid.
  • Moreno, G., 2002. Spain. In: Paris, P. (ed). Extant Silvoarable Practices in Europe, Report. www1.montpellier.inra.fr/safe/english/results/annual_report/Extant-SA-parctices-in-Europe.pdf. Accessed. 20 June 2016.
  • Moreno, G., 2004. El árbol en el medio agrícola. Foresta 27 (3), 170-176.
  • Mosquera-Losada, M.R., McAdam, J., Romero-Franco, R., Santiago-Freijanes, J.J., Riguero-Rodríquez, A., 2009. Definitions and components of agroforestry practices in Europe. In: Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., McAdam, J., Mosquera-Losada, M. (eds) Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Springer Science + Business Media B.V. Dordrecht, pp. 3-19.
  • Mosquera-Losada, M.R., Moreno, G., Santiago-Freijanes, J.J., Ferreiro-Domínguez, N., 2015. Sistemas Agroforestales y PAC. Ambienta 112, 110-124.
  • Mosquera-Losada, M.R., Santiago-Freijanes, J.J., Pisanelli, A., Rois, M., Smith, J., den Herder, M., Moreno, G., Malignier, N., Ruiz-Mirazo, J., Lamersdorf, N., Ferreiro-Domínguez, N., Balaguer, F., Pantera, A., Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., González-Hernández, P., Fernández-Lorenzo, J.L., Romero-Franco, R., Chalmin, A., García de Jalón, S., Garnett, K., Graves, A., Burgess, P.J., 2016. Extent and Success of current policy measures to promote agroforestry across Europe. https://www.agforward.eu/index.php/en/extent-and-success-of-current-policy-measures-to-promote-agroforestry-across-europe.html. Accessed. 26 October 2017.
  • Pardini, A., Mori, S., Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., Mosquera-Losada, M.R. 2010. Efecto del arbolado en la producción de pasto y trigo Triticum aestivum L. ecológicos en la Maremma Toscana, Italia central. Pastos 40, 211-223.
  • Pisanelli, A., Marandola, D., Marongiu, S., Paris, P., Rosati, A., Romano, R., 2014. The role of development policy in supporting agroforestry systems in EU. Actas de la 2a Conferencia EURAF, Cottbus (Alemania) 4-6 Junio 2014.
  • Reisner, Y., de Filippi, R., Herzog, F., Palma, J., 2007. Target regions for silvoarable agroforestry in Europe. Ecol. Eng. 29, 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.020
  • Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Nú-ez, E., González-Hernández, P., McAdam J.H., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., 2009. Agroforestry systems in Europe: productive, ecological and social perspective. In: Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A.R., McAdam, J., Mosquera-Losada, M.R. (eds.). Agroforestry in Europe: Current Status and Future Prospects. Springer, pp. 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8272-6
  • Rois, M., Lovric, N., Lovric, M., den Herder, M., Graves, A., Pisanelli, A., Mosquera-Losada, M., Ferreiro-Rodríguez, N., García De Jalón, S., Vityi, A., Varga, A., Burgess, P.J., 2016. Environmental and socio-economic framework conditions of agroforestry in different regions in Europe. https://www.agforward.eu/index.php/de/environmental-and-socio-economic-framework-conditions-of-agroforestry-in-different-regions-in-europe.html. Accessed. 26 October 2017.
  • Sereke, F., 2012. Transdisciplinary development of agroforestry systems. Tesis Doctoral. ETH Zurich.
  • Tóth, G., Montanarella, L., Rusco, E., 2008. Threats to Soil Quality in Europe. JRC Scientific and technical report. https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_Archive/eusoils_docs/other/EUR23438.pdf. Accessed. 27 June 2016.
Data source: Dialnet