The Five-Factor model and job performance in low complexity jobsA quantitative synthesis

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aguado, D., Rico, R., Rubio, V.J., Fernández, L., Applicant reactions to social network web use in personnel selection. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 32 (2016), 183–190, 10.1016/j.rpto.2016.09.001.
• Aguinis, H., Performance management. 2007, Edinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, UK.
• AlDosiry, K.S., Alkhadher, O.H., AlAqraa, E.M., Anderson, N., Relationships between emotional intelligence and sales performance in Kuwait. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 32 (2016), 39–45, 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.09.002.
• Alonso, P., Moscoso, S., Cuadrado, D., Procedimientos de selección de personal en pequeñas y medianas empresas españolas. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 31 (2015), 79–89, 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.04.002.
• Anderson, N., Ahmed, S., Costa, A.C., Applicant reactions in Saudi Arabia: Organizational attractiveness and core-self evaluation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 20 (2012), 197–208, 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00592.x.
• Anderson, N., Salgado, J.F., Hülsheger, U.R., Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 18 (2010), 291–304, 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00512.x.
• Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 44 (1991), 1–26, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.
• Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1993), 111–118, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.111.
• Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., Judge, T., Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9 (2001), 9–30, 10.1111/1468-2389.00160.
• Borman, W.C., Bryant, R.H., Dorio, J., The measurement of task performance as criteria in selection research. Farr, J.L., Tippins, N., (eds.) Handbook of employee selection, 2010, Routledge, New York, 439–462.
• Borman, W.C., Penner, L.A., Allen, T.D., Motowidlo, S.J., Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9 (2001), 52–69, 10.1111/1468-2389.00163.
• Campbell, J.P., Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Dunnette, M.D., Hough, L.M., (eds.) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2nd ed, 1990, Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, CA, 687–732.
• Cattell, R.B., Eber, H.W., Tatsuoka, M.M., Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire, (16 PF). 1970, Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign, IL.
• Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R., Revised NEO personality inventory, (NEO-PI-R), and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. 1992, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
• Da Costa, S., Páez, D., Sánchez, F., Garaigordobil, M., Gondim, S., Personal factors of creativity: A second order meta-analysis. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 31 (2015), 165–173, 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.06.002.
• Dorsey, D., Cortina, J., Luchman, J., Adaptive and citizenship-related behaviors at work. Farr, J., Tippins, N., (eds.) Handbook of employee selection, 2010, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, 463–487.
• Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, S.B.G., Manual for the Eysenck personality questionnaire. 1975, Hodder & Stoughton, London.
• Flanagan, J.C., The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 51 (1954), 327–358.
• Gilar, R., De Haro, J.M., Castejón, J.L., Individual differences in predicting occupational success: the effect of population heterogeneity. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 31 (2015), 101–107, 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.03.002.
• Grieve, R., Hayes, J., Employment testing online, offline, and over the phone: Implications for e-assessment. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 32 (2016), 95–101, 10.1016/j.rpto.2016.04.001.
• Hoffman, B.J., Dilchert, S., A review of citizenship and counterproductive behaviors in organizational decision-making. Schmitt, N., (eds.) The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection, 2012, Oxford, 543–569.
• Hogan, R., Hogan, J., Manual for the Hogan personality inventory. 1995, Hogan Assessment Systems, Tulsa, OK.
• Hogan, J., Holland, B., Using theory to evaluate personality and job performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003), 100–112, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100.
• Hough, L.M., The ‘Big Five’ personality variables–construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance 5 (1992), 139–155, 10.1080/08959285.1992.9667929.
• Hunter, J.E., Hunter, R.F., Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin 96 (1984), 72–98, 10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72.
• Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Locke, E.A., Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2000), 237–249, 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.37.
• Judge, T.A., Rodell, J.B., Klinger, R.L., Simon, L.S., Crawford, E.R., Hierarchical representations of the Five-Factor Model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology 98 (2013), 875–925, 10.1037/a0033901.
• Liu, X., Potocnik, K., Anderson, N., Applicant reactions to selection methods in China. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 24 (2016), 296–303, 10.1111/ijsa.12148.
• Morgeson, F.P., Campion, M.A., Dipboye, R.L., Hollenbeck, J.R., Murphy, K., Schmitt, N., Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel contexts. Personnel Psychology 60 (2007), 683–729, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.x.
• Moscoso, S., Salgado, J.F., “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 12 (2004), 356–362, 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00290.x.
• Moscoso, S., Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., How do I get a job, What are they looking for? Personnel Selection Assessment. Chmiel, N., Fraccaroli, F., Sverke, M., (eds.) An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology, 2017, John Wiley & Sons, 25–47.
• Mount, M.K., Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Five-Factor Model of personality and Performance in Jobs Involving Interpersonal Interactions. Human Performance 11 (1998), 145–165, 10.1080/08959285.1998.9668029.
• Raman, P., Sambasiva, M., Kumar, N., Counterproductive work behavior among frontline government employees: Role of personality, emotional intelligence, affectivity, emotional labor, and emotional exhaustion. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 32 (2016), 25–37, 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.11.002.
• Rodríguez, A., Validez predictiva e impacto adverso de la entrevista conductual estructurada en el sector público. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 32 (2016), 75–85, 10.1016/j.rpto.2016.04.003.
• Rolland, J.P., Mogenet, J.L., Manuel d'application Description en Cinq Dimensions (D5D) [Technical manual Description in Five Dimensions - D5D]. 2001, Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris.
• Salgado, J.F., Análisis exploratorio y confirmatorio del Inventario de Personalidad de Cinco Factores (IP/5F). Psicológica 17 (1996), 353–366.
• Salgado, J.F., The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1997), 30–43, 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30.
• Salgado, J.F., Manual Técnico para el Inventario de Personalidad de Cinco Factores IP/5F. 1998, Tórculo, Santiago de Compostela.
• Salgado, J.F., The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 10 (2002), 117–125, 10.1111/1468-2389.00198.
• Salgado, J.F., Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 76 (2003), 323–346, 10.1348/096317903769647201.
• Salgado, J.F., Estimating Coefficients of equivalence and stability for job performance ratings: The importance of controlling for transient error on criterion measurement. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 23 (2015), 37–44, 10.1111/ijsa.12093.
• Salgado, J.F., A Theoretical Model of Psychometric Effects of Faking on Assessment Procedures: Empirical findings and implications for personality at work. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 24 (2016), 209–228, 10.1111/ijsa.12142.
• Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., De Fruyt, F., Rolland, J.P., A meta-analytic study of GMA validity for different occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003), 1068–1081, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1068.
• Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Tauriz, G., The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 88 (2015), 797–834, 10.1111/joop.12098.
• Salgado, J.F., Bastida, M., Predicting Expatriate Effectiveness: The role of personality, cross-cultural adjustment, and organizational support. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 25 (2017), 267–275, 10.1111/ijsa.12178.
• Salgado, J.F., Cabal, A.L., Evaluación del Desempeño en la Administración Pública del Principado de Asturias: Análisis de las Propiedades Psicométricas. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 27 (2011), 75–91.
• Salgado, J.F., Moscoso, S., Meta-analysis of interrater reliability of job performance ratings in validity studies of personnel selection. Perceptual and Motor skills 83 (1996), 1195–1201, 10.2466/pms.83.3f.1195.
• Salgado, J.F., Moscoso, S., Anderson, N., Correction for criterion reliability in validity generalization: The consistency of Hermes, the utility of Midas. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 32 (2016), 17–23, 10.1016/j.rpto.2015.12.001.
• Salgado, J.F., Moscoso, S., Berges, A., Conscientiousness, Its Facets, and the Prediction of Job Performance Ratings: Evidence against the narrow measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 21 (2013), 74–84, 10.1111/ijsa12018.
• Salgado, J.F., Moscoso, S., Lado, M., Evidence of cross-cultural invariance of the big five personality dimensions in work settings. European Journal of Personality 17 (2003), S67–S76, 10.1002/per.482.
• Salgado, J.F., Moscoso, S., Sanchez, J.I., Alonso, P., Choragwicka, B., Berges, A., Validity of the five-factor model and their facets: The impact of performance measure and facet residualization on the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 24 (2015), 325–349, 10.1080/1359432x.2014.903241.
• Salgado, J.F., Tauriz, G., The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories, and job performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 23 (2014), 3–30, 10.1080/1359432X.2012.716198.
• Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E., Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods 1:2 (1996), 199–223, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.199.
• Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E., Methods of meta-analysis. Third edition, 2015, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
• Schmidt, F.L., Le, H., Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods. Department of Management and Organizations. 2014, Iowa City, IA, University of Iowa.
• Schmidt, F.L., Le, H., Ilies, R., Beyond Alpha: an empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs. Psychological Methods 8 (2003), 206–224, 10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.206.
• Schmidt, F.L., Shaffer, J.A., Oh, I.-S., Increased accuracy for range restriction corrections: implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance. Personnel Psychology 61 (2008), 827–868, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00132.x.
• Snyder, J., Shahani-Denning, C., Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods: A look at professionals in Mumbai, India. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 20 (2012), 297–307, 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00601.x.
• Spector, P.E., Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. Psychological Bulletin 91 (1982), 482–497, 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.482.
• Tett, R.P., Jackson, D.N., Rothstein, M., Personality measures as predictors of job performance: a meta-analytic review. Personnel psychology 44 (1991), 703–742, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x.
• US Department of Labor (1991). Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT). Forth Edition, Revised 1991. Lincolnwood, IL: VGM Career Books.
• Van Scotter, J.R., Motowidlo, S.J., Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (1996), 525–531, 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525.
• Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D.S., Schmidt, F.L., Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (1996), 557–560, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679.