Rectangular input-output models by moore-penrose inverse

  1. Pereira López, Xesús 1
  2. Melchor Fernández Fernández 1
  3. André Carrascal Incera 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Zeitschrift:
Rect@: Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA

ISSN: 1575-605X

Datum der Publikation: 2014

Ausgabe: 15

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 13-24

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Rect@: Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA

Zusammenfassung

The official available data must be the primary datasource in economic studies. However, in economic modelling related with supply-use tables this aspect is ignored. In fact, as in this structure the number of products exceeds the number of industries, there is considerable information lost due to aggregations in order to get square matrices. Nevertheless, rectangular matrices can directly be modelled using generalized inverses. The main aim of this paper is to highlight the fact that it is not required to elaborate symmetric input-output tables for modelling. In spite of it, in this paper it is reminded how to construct symmetric matrices through the two main traditional hypotheses: product technology and industry technology. Finally, an empirical application is shown with the goal of highlight different alternatives in this area.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • X. Pereira, A. Carrascal and M. Fernández, Impacto Económico do Turismo Receptor através de Modelos Origem-Destino: uma Aplicação para a Galiza, in Modelos Operacionais de Economia Regional, eds. E. Haddad, P. Ramos and E. Castro (Principia Editora, Parede-Portugal, 2011), pp. 101– 121.
  • E. H. Moore, On the Reciprocal of the General Algebraic Matrix (Abstract), Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (1920) 394–395.
  • R. Penrose, A Generalized Inverse for Matrices, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 51 (1955) 406–413.
  • J. Baksalary and O. M. Baksalary, Particular Formulae for the Moore-Penrose Inverse of a Column Wise Partitioned Matrix, Linear Algebra and its Applications. 421(1) (2007) 16–23.
  • A. Schinnar, The Leontief Dynamic Generalized Inverse, The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 92(4) (1978) 641–52.
  • A. Olsen, General Perfect Aggregation of Industries in Input-Output Models, Economic Modelling. Working Paper Series, 2 (2000).
  • M. Luppino, G. Gajewski, S. Zohir, B. Khondker and D. Crowther, Estimating the Impacts of the Jamuna Bridge on Poverty Levels in Bangldesh using SAM and CGE Models: A Comparative Study. EcoMod Input-Output and General Equilibrium: Data, Modeling and Policy Analysis Conference. (Bruxelas, 2004).
  • J. Zhao, The Techniques of Compiling the Rectangular UV Input-Output Table under the Hypothesis of Product Technology. 14th International Input-Output Conference (Montreal, 2002).
  • X. Pereira, X. L. Quiñoá and M. Fernández, Actualización Global de Tablas Origen-Destino: una Alternativa al Método Euro, Análise Económica. 42 (Santiago de Compostela, 2011).
  • United Nations, Handbook of Input-Output Table Compilation and Analysis, Studies in Methods, Series F. 74 (1999).
  • Eurostat, Updating and Projection Input-Output Tables. (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg, 2008).
  • P. Kop Jansen and T. ten Raa, The Choice of Model in the Construction of Input-Output Coefficients Matrices, International Economic Review. 31(1) (1990) 213–227.
  • A. Steenge, The Commodity Technology Revisited: Theoretical Basis and an Application to Error Location in the Make-Use Framework, Economic Modelling. 7(4) (1990) 376–387.
  • P. Konijn, The Make and Use of Commodities by Industries: on the Compilation of Input-Output Data from the National Accounts. (Enschede, Faculty of Public Administration and Public Policy, University of Twente, 1994).
  • J. P. Mattey and T. ten Raa, Primary Versus Secondary Production Techniques in US Manufacturing, Review of Income and Wealth. 43 (1997) 449–464.
  • T. ten Raa and J. M. Rueda-Cantuche, Análisis de las Producciones Secundarias en la Economía Andaluza, Revista de Estudios Regionales. 73(2) (2005) 43–77.
  • J. M. Rueda-Cantuche, Econometric Analysis of European Carbon Dioxide Emissions based on Rectangular Supply-Use Tables, Economic Systems Research. 23(3) (2011) 261–280.
  • A. Armstrong, Technology Assumptions in the Construction of United Kingdom Input-Output Tables, in Estimating and Updating Input-Output Coefficients, eds. R. Allen and W. F. Gossling (Input-Output Publishing Co, London, 1975).
  • C. Stahmer, Transformation Matrices in Input-Output Compilation, in Input-Output Modelling, eds. A. Smyshlyaev (Springer, New York, 1985), pp. 225–236.
  • P. Young, The US Input-Output Experience-Present Status and Future Prospects, in Problems of Compilation of Input-Output Tables, eds. A. Franz and N. Rainer (Orac, Viena, 1986), pp. 121–145.
  • N. Rainer, Descriptive Versus Analytical Make-Use Systems: Some Austrian Experiences, in Frontiers of Input-Output Analysis, eds. R. Miller, K. Polenske and A. Rose (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
  • C. Almon, Product-to-Product Tables via Product-Technology with no Negative Flows, Economics Systems Research. 12(1) (2000) 27–43.
  • J. Guo, A. M. Lawson and M. A. Planting, From Make-Use to Symmetric I-O Tables: An Assessment of Alternative Technology Assumptions. 14th International Input-Output Conference (Montreal, 2002).
  • A. Ghosh, Input-Output Approach in an Allocation System, Economica. 25(97) (1958) 58–64.
  • R. Bon, Comparative Stability Analysis of Demand-Side and Supply side Input-Output Models, International Journal of Forecasting. 2 (1986) 231–235.
  • J. Oosterhaven, On the Plausibility of the Supply-Driven Input-Output Model, Journal of Regional Science. 28 (1988) 203–217.
  • J. Oosterhaven, The Supply-Driven Input-Output Model: A New Interpretation but Still Implausible, Journal of Regional Science. 29 (1989) 459–465.
  • J. Oosterhaven, Leontief versus Ghoshian Price and Quantity Models, Southern Economic Journal. 62 (3) (1996) 750–759.
  • A. Rose and T. Allison, On the Plausibility of the Supply-Driven Input-Output Model: Empirical Evidence on Joint Stability, Journal of Regional Science. 29 (1989) 451–458.
  • E. Dietzenbacher, In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: a Reinterpretation as a Price Model, Journal of Regional Science. 37 (1997) 629–651.
  • A. I. Guerra and F. Sancho, Revisiting the Original Ghosh Model: can it be Made more Plausible? Economic Systems Research. 23(3) (2011) 319–328.
  • V. Viet, Practices in Input-Output Table Compilation, Regional Science and Urban Economics. 24 (1994) 27–54.
  • M. Kornelis and B. Koole, Building Compatible Supply, Use, and Input-Output Tables on the Basis of Integrated Data: An Application to the Agricultural Economy of the Netherlands, Agricultural Economics Research Institute (Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, 2003).
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet