Sobre la actividad de las flotas de pesca a distancia en América latinauna primera aproximación

  1. Verdugo Matés, Rosa María
  2. Villasante Larramendi, Carlos Sebastian
Revista:
Semata: Ciencias sociais e humanidades

ISSN: 1137-9669,  2255-5978

Ano de publicación: 2013

Título do exemplar: El mar: una mirada transversal desde las ciencias sociales y las humanidades

Número: 25

Páxinas: 83-100

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Semata: Ciencias sociais e humanidades

Resumo

The objective of this paper is to analyse how the overexploitation phenomena in the European Union led to the development of a bathymetric and geographical expansion of the European fishing fleet towards Latin American fishing grounds. The specific goals of this paper are: a) to examine the status of the main commercial species in the North Atlantic Ocean, in particular the North Seacod (Gadus morhua) stock; b) to know the presence of the foreign fishing fleets in Latin American fishing grounds; c) to understand the role of the fishing strategies developed by the distant water fishing fleets by focusing on the Argentinean hake (Merluccius hubbsi) and the Peruvian anchovy (Engrasulis rigens).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agnew, D.; Pearce, J.; Pramod, G.; Watson, R.; Beddington, J.R.; Pitcher, T.J. “Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing”. PloS ONE. 2009, vol 4, núm. 2, p. 4570.
  • Anticamara, J.A.; Watson, R.; Gelchu, A.; Pauly, D. “Global fishing effort (1950–2010): Trends, gaps, and implications”. Fish Res. 2011, núm. 107, p. 131-136.
  • Aranda, M. “Developments on fisheries management in Peru: The new individual vessel quota system for the anchoveta fishery”. Fisheries Research. 2009, núm. 96, p. 308-312.
  • Arias Schreiber, M. “The evolution of legal instruments and the sustainability of the Peruvian anchovy fishery”. Marine Policy. 2012, núm. 36, p. 78-89.
  • Arias Schreiber, M.,. Halliday A. 2013. “Uncommon among the commons? Disentangling the sustainability of the Peruvian anchovy fishery”. Ecology and Society. 2013, 18(2).
  • Bovarnick, A., F. Alpizar, And C. Schnell (Eds.). The Importance of Biodiversity and Ecosystems in Economic Growth and Equity in Latin America and the Caribbean: An economic valuation of ecosystems. United Nations Development Programme, 2010.
  • Boyd, C. “Fisheries sector”. En: The Importance of Biodiversity and Ecosystems in Economic Growth and Equity in Latin America and the Caribbean: An economic valuation of ecosystems. United Nations Development Programme, 2010. p. 83-126.
  • Castilla, J.C.; Defeo, O. “Latin-American benthic shellfisheries: emphasis on co-management and experimental practices”. Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2001, núm. 11, p. 1-30.
  • Cedepesca. La política de subsidios pesqueros de la Unión Europea, el Acuerdo en materia de pesca marítima entre la UE y la República Argentina y sus consecuencias en la sustentabilidad de las pesquerías del Atlántico Sudoeste, particularmente en la merluza argentina (Merluccius Hubbsi). 1999.
  • Christensen, V.; Guénette, S.; Heymans, J.J.; Walters, C.J.; Watson, R.; Zeller, D.; Pauly, D. “Hundred-year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes”. Fish Fish. 2003, núm. 4, p. 1-24.
  • CIEM. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). Report of the ICES Advisory Committee. ICES Advice 2011; Book 9. 2011.
  • Costello, C.C.; Ovando, D.; Hilborn, R.; Gaines, S.D.; Deschenes, O.; Lester, S.E. “Status and solutions for the world’s unassessed fisheries”. Science. 2012, núm. 26, p. 517-520.
  • Cox, M.; G. Arnold; Villamayor Tomas S. A review of design principles for communitybased 565. Natural resource management. Ecology and Society. Disponible en internet: <www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss34/ art38/2010>.
  • Dato, C., Bambill, G., Cañete, G., Villarino, M.L., Aubone, A. “Estimación cuantitativa del descarte en la pesquería de merluza realizado por la flota comercial argentina”. INIDEP Documento Científico. 2006, núm. 6, p. 31-38.
  • Defeo, O.; Castilla, J.C. “More than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management success in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheries”. Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2005, núm. 15, p. 265-283.
  • Defeo, O.; Castilla J.C. “Governance and governability of coastal shellfisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean: multi-scale emerging models and effects of globalization and climate change”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2012, núm. 4, p. 344-350.
  • European Commission of the European Communities. Green Paper-Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. Brussels, 22.4.2009 2009; COM 163 final.
  • FAO The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. State of the World’s Fisheries and Aquaculture. Roma: FAO, 2012.
  • Fundación Vida Silvestre. Crisis de la pesca de Merluza Estado de situación, implicancias y propuestas. Documento de Posición. 2008. Disponible en internet: <assets. wwfar.panda.org/downloads/crisis_de_la_pesca_de_merluza_2008.pdf> [consulta: 21 octubre 2010].
  • Gelcich, S.; Hughes, T.P.; Olsson, P.; Folke, C.; Defeo, O.; Fernandez, M.; Foale, S.; Gunderson, L.H.; Rodriguez-Sickert, C.; Scheffer, M.; Steneck, R.S.; Castilla, J.C. “Navigating transformation in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources”. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010, vol 107, núm. 39, p. 16794-16799.
  • Godelman, E. Propuesta de ordenamiento de la pesquería de merluza en Argentina. CeDePesca, Argentina. 2004. Disponible en Internet: <www.cedepesca.org.ar> [consulta: 19 octubre 2009].
  • Gutiérrez, N.; Hilborn, R.; Defeo O. “Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries”. Nature. 2011, núm. 470, p. 386-389.
  • Hammergren, L.. “Peruvian political and administrative responses to El Niño”. En: GLANTZ M.H.; THOMPSON J.D. (eds.). Resource Management and Environmental Uncertainty: lessons from coastal upwelling fisheries. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981. p. 317-350.
  • Heal, G.; Schlenker, W. Economics: “Sustainable fisheries”. Nature. 2009, núm. 455, p. 1044-1045.
  • Hilborn, R.; Walters, C. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment, Choice, dynamics and uncertainty. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1992.
  • Irusta, G.; Veis, S.; Simonazzi, M.; Castrucci, R. Los desembarques argentinos de merluza (Merluccius hubbis) entre 1987-1997. Informe Técnico 42. Mar del Plata: INIDEP, 2001.
  • Jackson, J.B.C.; Kirby, M.X.; Berger, W.H.; Bjorndal, K.A.; Botsford, L.W., Bourque, B.J.; Bradbury, R.H.; Cooke, R.; Erlandson, J.; Estes, J.A.; Hughes, T.P.; Kidwell, S.; Lange, C.B.; Lenihan, H.S.; Pandolfi, J.M.; Peterson, C.H.; Steneck, R.S.; Tegner, M.J.; Warner, R.R. “Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems”. Science. 2001, vol 293, núm. 5530, p. 629-637.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005.
  • Munro, G. “The optimal management of transboundary renewable resources”. Canadian Journal of Economics. 1979, núm. 12, p. 353-376.
  • Norse, E.A.; Brooke, S.; Cheung, W.W.L.; Clark, M.R.; Ekeland, I.; Froese, F.; Gjerde, K.M.; Haedrich, R.L.; Heppell, S.S.; Morato, T.; Morgan, L.E.; Pauly, D.; Sumaila, U.R.; Watson, R. “Sustainability of deep-sea fisheries”. Marine Policy. 2012, núm. 36, p. 307-320.
  • Ostrom, E. “Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: what have we learned?” En: Ingram, G.K.; Hong, Y.H. (eds.). Property rights and Land Policies. Cambridge: Lincoln. Institute of Land Policy, MA, 2009. p. 25-51.
  • Ostrom, E.; Burger, J.; Field, C.B.; Norgaard, R.B.; Policansky, D. “Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges”. Science. 1999, núm. 284, p. 278-282.
  • Pauly, D.; Christensen, V.; Guénette, S.; Pitcher, T.; Sumaila, U.R.; Walters, C.J.; Watson, R.; Zeller, D. “Towards sustainability in world fisheries”. Nature. 2002, núm. 418, p. 689-695.
  • Sumaila, U.R.; Cheung, W.; Dyck, A.; Gueye, K.; Huang, L.; Lam, V.; Pauly, D.; Srinivasan, T.; Swartz, W.; Zeller, D. “Benefits of rebuilding global marine fisheries outweigh costs”. PLoS ONE. 2012, vol 7, núm. 7, e40542.
  • Villasante, S. “Better fishery management could significantly increase economic returns, Argentina”. The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Beijer Discussion Papers Nº 331. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden. 2012.
  • Villasante, S.; Morato, T.; Rodríguez-González, D.; Antelo, M.; Österblom, H.; Watling, L.; Nouvian, C.; Gianni, M.; Macho, G. “Sustainability of deep-sea fish species under the European Union Common Fisheries Policy”. Ocean Coast Manage. 2012, núm. 70, p. 31-37.
  • Villasante, S., Rodríguez-González, D., Antelo, M. “On the non-compliance in the North Sea Cod stock”. Sustainability 2013a, núm. 5(5), p. 1974-1993.
  • Villasante, S., Rodríguez-González, D., Antelo, M. “All fish for China?”. AMBIOA Journal of the Human Environment 2013b, núm. 24(7) [en prensa].
  • Villasante, S.; Sumaila, U.R. “Estimating the effect of technological efficiency on the European fishing fleet”. Mar Policy. 2010, núm. 34, p. 720-722.
  • World Bank and FAO. The Sunken billions: the economic justification for fisheries reform. Washington D.C. 2009.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet