Lenguaje y Teoría de la Menteuna aproximación multidimensional

  1. Resches, Mariela
  2. Serrat Sellabona, Elisabet
  3. Rostán Sánchez, Carles
  4. Esteban Guitart, Moisès
Revista:
Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

ISSN: 0210-3702,  1578-4126

Ano de publicación: 2010

Volume: 33

Número: 3

Páxinas: 315-334

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1174/021037010792215136 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

Ahora bien, ¿hasta qué punto estas perspectivas son excluyentes? Para responder a esta pregunta, debemos considerar una serie de cuestiones. En primer lugar, la hipótesis comunicativa asume una perspectiva amplia acerca del desarrollo de la cognición social, mientras que la hipótesis más específicamente lingüística, sin negar la existencia de otras habilidades sociocognitivas, se centra en el desarrollo de un aspecto específico, la CFC. Si, como mencionábamos en la introducción, entendemos las habilidades socio- cognitivas en términos de un desarrollo amplio y gradual, podemos considerar que la CFC es un hito particular dentro de este desarrollo, y por lo tanto ambas hipótesis no son incompatibles En segundo lugar, y siguiendo una propuesta de Astington y Baird (2005b), para comprender la influencia del lenguaje sobre la TM es necesario abordar el desarrollo lingüístico desde su doble vertiente, comunicativa y representacional. Esta misma distinción funcional puede utilizarse para diferenciar entre ambas hipótesis cau-sales: mientras que la primera de ellas enfatiza la función comunicativa e interpersonal del lenguaje, la segunda hace hincapié en la función del lenguaje en tanto que instru-mento de representación intraindividual. Justamente, si consideramos que estas dos funciones no son contrapuestas sino complementarias, podemos concluir que las dos hipótesis que estamos considerando son dos versiones igualmente complementarias acerca del papel facilitador del lenguaje para la emergencia de la TM.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ADRIAN, J. E., CLEMENTE, R. & VILLANUEVA, L. (2007). Mothers' use of cognitive state verbs in picture-book reading and the development of children's understanding of mind: a longitudinal study. Child Development, 78 (4), 1052-1067.
  • AKHTAR, N. & TOMASELLO, M. (1996). Twenty four-month-old children learn words for absent objects and actions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 79-93.
  • ASTINGTON, J. & JENKINS, J. (1995). Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 151-165.
  • ASTINGTON, J. & JENKINS, J. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1311-1320.
  • ASTINGTON, J. W. & BAIRD, J. A. (Eds.) (2005a). Why language matters for theory of mind. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • ASTINGTON, J. W. & BAIRD, J. A. (2005b). Introduction. En J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 3-25). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • BALDWIN, D. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. En C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: its origins and role in development (pp. 131-158). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  • BARON-COHEN, S., BALDWIN, D. & CROWSON, M. (1997). Do children with autism use the speaker's direction of gaze strategy to crack the code of language? Child Development, 68, 48-57.
  • BARTSCH, K. & WELLMAN, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. Nueva York: Oxford University Press
  • BATES, E. & GOODMAN, J. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12 (5/6), 507-586.
  • BEHNE, T., CARPENTER, M. & TOMASELLO, M. (2005). One-year olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. Developmental Science, 8, 492-499.
  • BRETHERTON, I. (1991). Intentional communication and the development of an understanding of mind. En D. Frye & Ch. Moore (Eds.), Children's theories of mind: mental states and social understanding (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: L.E.A.
  • BUTTERWORTH, G. (1994). Theory of Mind and the facts of embodiment. En C. Lewis & P. Mitchell (Eds.), Children's Early Understanding of Mind: Origins and Development (pp. 115-132). Hove: L.E.A.
  • CALL, J. & TOMASELLO, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (5), 187-192.
  • CARLSON, S., MOSES, L. & HIX, H. (1998). The role of inhibitory control in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief. Child Development, 69, 672-691.
  • CARPENDALE, J. & LEWIS, CH. (2006). How children develop social understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • CARPENTER, M., NAGELL, K. & TOMASELLO, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4), serial n° 255.
  • CARPENTER, M. & TOMASELLO, M. (2000). Joint attention, cultural learning, and language acquisition: implications for children with autism. En A. M. Wetherby & B. M. Prizant (Eds.), Communication and language issues in autism and pervasive developmental disorder: A transactional developmental perspective (pp. 31-54). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
  • CHARMAN, T. (2003). Why is joint attention a pivotal skill in autism? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 358, 315-324.
  • CHARMAN, T., BARON-COHEN, S., SWETTENHAM, J., BAIRD, G., COX, A. & DREW, A. (2000). Testing joint attention, imitation and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15, 481-498.
  • CHARMAN, T., BARON-COHEN, S., SWETTENHAM, J., BAIRD, G., DREW, A. & COX, A. (2003). Predicting language outcome in infants with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 38, 265-285.
  • CHEUNG, H., HSUAN-CHIH, C., CRED, N., HG, L., WANG, S. P. & MO, L. (2004). Relative roles of general and complementation language in theory-of-mind development: evidence from Cantonese and English. Child Development, 75 (4), 1155-1170.
  • DE ROSNAY, M. & HUGHES, C. (2006). Conversation and theory of mind: do children talk their way to socio-cognitive understanding? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 7-37.
  • DE VILLIERS, J. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? En J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 186-219). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • DE VILLIERS, J. & PYERS, J. (2002). Complements to Cognition. A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false belief understanding. Cognitive Development 17, 1037-1060.
  • DE VILLIERS, J. & DE VILLIERS, P. (2000). Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. En P. Mitchell & K. Riggs (Eds.), Children's Reasoning and the Mind (pp. 191-228). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • DE VILLIERS, P. (2005). The role of language in theory of mind development: what deaf children tell us. En J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 266-297). NuevaYork: Oxford University Press.
  • DENHAM, S., ZOLLER, D. & COUCHOUD, E. (1994). Socialization of preschoolers' emotion understanding. Developmental Psychology, 30 (6), 928-937.
  • DUNN, J. (1988). The beginnings of social understanding. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • DUNN, J. & BROWN, J. (1993). Early conversations about causality: Content, pragmatics and developmental change. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 107-123.
  • DUNN, J., BROWN, J., SLOMKOWSKI, C., TESLA, C. & YOUNGBLADE, L. (1991). Young children's understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs: individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 62, 1352-1366.
  • ENSOR, R. & HUGHES, C. (2008). Content or connectedness? Mother-child talk and early social understanding. Child Development, 79 (1), 201-216.
  • FILIPPOVA, E. & ASTINGTON, J. (2008). Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development, 79 (1), 126-138.
  • FISHER, N. (2002). Language and Theory of Mind en children with autism and learning difficulties. Poster presentado en la conferencia internacional "Why language matters for Theory of Mind", Toronto, Canadá.
  • GALE, E., DE VILLIERS, P., DE VILLIERS, J. & PYERS, J. (1996). Language and theory of mind in oral deaf children. En A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20 th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Volume 1, pp. 213-224). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • HALE, C. & TAGER-FLUSBERG, H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: a training study. Developmental Science, 6 (3), 346-359.
  • HAPPÉ, F. (1993). Communicative competences and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101-119.
  • HAPPÉ, F. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843-855
  • HARRIS, P. (2005). Conversation, pretense, and Theory of Mind. En J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 70-83). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • JACQUES, S. & ZELAZO, D. (2005). Language and the development of cognitive flexibility: implications for theory of mind. En J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 144-162). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • JENKINS, J. M. & ASTINGTON, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with Theory of Mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 70-78.
  • KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. [Trad. cast. de J. C. Gómez & M. Núñez, Más allá de la modularidad. Madrid: Alianza, 1994].
  • LAGATTUTA, K. & WELLMAN, H. (2002). Differences in early parent-child conversations about negative versus positive emotions: Implications for the development of emotion understanding. Developmental Psychology, 38, 564-580.
  • LESLIE, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of Theory of Mind. Psychological Review, 94, 412-426.
  • LESLIE, A. & POLIZZI, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: two conjetures. Developmental Science, 1, 247-253.
  • LOHMANN, H. & TOMASELLO, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: a training study. Child Development, 74 (4), 1130-1144.
  • MEINS, E., FERNYHOUGH, C., RUSSELL, J. & CLARK-CARTER, D. (1998). Security of attachment as a predictor of symbolic and mentalising abilities: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 7, 1-24.
  • MEINS, E., FERNYHOUGH, C., WAINWRIGHT, R., DAS GUPTA, M., FRADLEY, E. & TUCKEY, M. (2002). Maternal mind-mindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 1715-1726.
  • MILLIGAN, K., ASTINGTON, J. & DACK, L. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-Analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78 (2), 622-646.
  • OLSON, D. (1988). On the origins of beliefs and other intencional states in children. En J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 414-426). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • O'NEILL, D. (1996). Two-year-old children's sensitivity to a parent's knowledge state when making requests. Child Development, 67, 659-677.
  • PERNER, J. (1988). Higher order beliefs and intentions in children's understanding of social interaction. En J. W. Astington; P. L. Harris & D. Olson (Eds.), Developing Theories of Mind (pp. 271-292). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • PERNER, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Trad. cast. de M. A. Galmarini: Comprender la mente representacional. Barcelona: Paidós, 1994].
  • PERNER, J., RUFFMAN, T. & LEEKAM, S. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228-1238.
  • PERNER, J., SPRUNG, M., ZAUNER, P. & HAIDER, H. (2003). Want-that is understood well before think-that, say-that, and false belief: A test of deVilliers' linguistic determinism on German speaking children. Child Development, 74, 179-188.
  • PETERSON, C. & SIEGAL, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and the theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 459-474.
  • PLAUT, D. & KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. (1993). Representational development and theory-of-mind computations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 70-71.
  • PREMACK, D. & WOODRUFF, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515-526.
  • RIVIÈRE, A. & ESPAÑOL, S. (2003). La suspensión como mecanismo de creación semiótica. Estudios de Psicología, 24, 261-275.
  • RUFFMAN, T., SLADE, L. & CROWE, E. (2002). The relation between child and mothers' mental state language and theory-ofmind understanding. Child Development, 73, 734-751.
  • RUFFMAN, T., SLADE, L., ROWLANDSON, K., RUMSEY, C. & GARNHAM, A. (2003). How language relates to belief, desire, and emotion understanding. Cognitive Development, 18, 139-158.
  • RUSSELL, J., MAUTHNER, N., SHARPE, S. & TIDSWELL, T. (1991). The "Windows task" as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers' strategic deception. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 301-314.
  • SCHICK, B., DE VILLIERS, P., DE VILLIERS, J. & HOFFMEISTER, R. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78 (2), 376-396.
  • SLADE, L. & RUFFMAN, T. (2005). How language does (and does not) relate to theory of mind: A longitudinal study of syntax, semantics, working memory and false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 1-26.
  • SLAUGHTER, V., PETERSON, C. & MACKINTOSH, E. (2007). Mind what mother says: narrative input and theory of mind in typical children and those on the autism spectrum. Child Development, 78 (3), 839-858.
  • SORCE, J., EMDE, R., CAMPOS, J. & KLINNERT, M. (1985). Maternal emotional signaling: its effect on the visual cliff behavior of infants and young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 369-390.
  • TAGER-FLUSBERG, H. & JOSEPH, R. (2005). How language facilitates the acquisition of false belief understanding in children with autism. En J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 298-318). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • TAGER-FLUSBERG, H. & SULLIVAN, K. (1994). Predicting and explaining behavior: a comparison of autistic, mentally retarded and normal children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1059-1075.
  • TARDIF, T. & WELLMAN, H. (2000). Acquisition of mental state language in Mandarin-and Cantonese-speaking children. Developmental Psychology, 36, 25-43.
  • TAUMOEPEAU, M. & RUFFMAN, T. (2006). Mother and infant talk about mental states relates to desire language and emotion understanding. Child Development, 77 (2), 465-481.
  • TAUMOEPEAU, M. & RUFFMAN, T. (2008). Stepping stones to other's minds: maternal talk relates to child mental state language and emotion understanding at 15, 24 and 33 months. Child Development, 79 (2), 284-302.
  • TOMASELLO, M. (2001). Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life. En M. Tomasello & E. Bates (Eds.), Language development: the essential readings (pp. 111-128). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • TOMASELLO, M. (2006). Acquiring linguistic constructions. En D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (pp.255-298). Nueva York: Wiley.
  • TOMASELLO, M. & BARTON, M. (1994). Learning words in non-ostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30, 639-650.
  • TOMASELLO, M. & CARPENTER, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10 (1), 121-125.
  • TOMASELLO, M., CARPENTER, M. & LISZKOWSKI, U. (2007). A new look to infant pointing. Child Development, 78 (3), 705-722.
  • VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • WELLMAN, H., CROSS, D. & WATSON, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655-684.
  • WELLMAN, H., PHILLIPS, A., DUNPHY-LELII, S. & LALONDE, N. (2004). Infant social attention predicts preschool social cognition. Developmental Science, 7 (3), 283-288.
  • WELLMAN, H. M. (1993). Early understanding of the mind: the normal case. En S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding Other Minds: perspectives from autism (pp. 10-39). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • WIMMER, H. & PERNER, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and the constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128.
  • WINNER, E. & LEEKAN, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 257-270.
  • WOOLFE, T., WANT, S. & SIEGAL, M. (2002). Signposts to development: Theory of mind in deaf children. Child Development, 73, 768-778.
  • ZELAZO, P. D. & FRYE, D. (1997). Cognitive complexity and control: A theory of the development of deliberate reasoning and intencional action. En M. Stamenov (Ed.), Language structure, discourse, and the access to consciousness (pp. 113-153). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet