Validez de contenido de una Entrevista Conductual Estructurada

  1. Choragwicka, Beata
  2. Moscoso Ruibal, Silvia
Revista:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Año de publicación: 2007

Título del ejemplar: Avances Europeos en la Investigación del Desempeño Ocupacional y la Selección de Personal

Volumen: 23

Número: 1

Páginas: 75-92

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

Resumen

This paper reports on an empirical study of the content validity of a Structured Behavioural Interview (SBI). The study was based on 11 experts’ ratings, using a method proposed by Lawshe (1975). A significant Content Validity Ratio (CVR) was found for 4 out of 14 questions and for 4 out of 10 general dimensions. A Content Validity Index (CVI) of .86 was obtained for the significant dimensions as a whole and of .68 for the questions.Additionally, reliability was estimated by using the coefficient of agreement between raters (6 or 12) and the result was .78, similar to the .75 value obtained in meta-analyses by Conway, Jako and Goodman (1995) and by Salgado and Moscoso (1995).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, N. R. (1992). Eight decades of employment interview research: a retrospective meta-review and prospective commentary. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 2 (1), 1-32.
  • Arvey, R. D., y Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: a Summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
  • Campion, M. A.; Palmer, D.K, y Campion, J.E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel psychology, 50, 1-64.
  • Campion, M. A.; Pursell, E. D., y Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 2542.
  • Carrier, M. R.; Dalessio, A. T., y Brown, S. H. (1990). Correspondence between estimates of content and criterion-related validity values. Personnel Psychology, 43, 85-100.
  • Conway, J. M; Jako, R. A., y Goodman, D. F. (1995). A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(5), 565-579.
  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incidents technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
  • Green, P. C. y Hogan, D. D. (1982). Behavioral Interviewing. Memphis, TN.
  • Harris, M. M. (1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: a review of recent literature and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 42, 691- 725.
  • Huffcutt, A. I., y Arthur, W. Jr. (1994). Hunter y Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184-190.
  • Hunter, J. E., y Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
  • Janz, T. (1977). The behaviour based patterned interview: an effective alternative to the warm smile selection interview. Compendio de la Conferencia Anual de la Asociación de las Ciencias Administrativas de Canadá.
  • Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interview versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577-580.
  • Janz, T. (1989). The Patterned Behavior Description Interview: The best prophet of the future is the past. En R. W., Eder y G. R., Ferris (Eds.). The employment interview: Theory, research and practise. Beverly Hills, Sage: 158-168.
  • Latham, G. P. (1989). The reliability, validity and practicality of the situational interview. En R. W., Eder, y G. R., Ferris (Eds.). The employment interview: Theory, research and practise. Beverly Hills, Sage, 169-182.
  • Latham, G. P. et al. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422-427.
  • Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575.
  • Mayfield, E.C. (1964). The selection interview: A re-evaluation of published research. Personnel Psychology, 17, 239- 260.
  • McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., y Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (4), 599-616.
  • Moscoso, S. y Salgado, J. F. (2001). Entrevista Conductual Estructurada de Selección de Personal. Teoría, práctica y rentabilidad. Madrid, Pirámide.
  • Moscoso, S. y Salgado, J. F. (2001b). Psychometric properties of a structured interview to hire private security personnel. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(1), 51-59.
  • Motowidlo, S. J., Carter, G. W., Dunette, M. D. Tippins, N., Werner, s., Burnett, J.R y Vaughan, J. (1992). Studies of structured behavioral interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 571-588.
  • Reilly, R. R., y Chao, G. T. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 35, 1-62.
  • Salgado, J. F. (1995). Validez de las entrevistas conductuales estructuradas. Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 11, 9-24.
  • Salgado, J. F. (1999). Personnel selec- tion methods. En Cooper C. L. y Robertson I. T (Eds.). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, London, UK, John Wiley and Sons: 1-53.
  • Salgado, J. F., y Moscoso, S. (1995). Validez de las entrevistas conductuales estructuradas. Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 11, 9-24.
  • Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., y Gorriti, M. (2004). Investigaciones sobre la Entre- vista Conductual Estructurada (ECE) en la Selección de Personal en la Administración General del País Vasco: Meta-análisis de la Fiabilidad, Revista de Psicología de Trabajo y Organizaciones, 20 (2), 107- 139.
  • Salgado, J. F., Viswesvaran, C., y Ones, D. S. (2001). Predictors used for personnel selection. En N., Anderson, D. S., Ones, H. K., Sinangil, y C., Viswesvaran (Eds.). Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Vol 1. London, UK, Sage: 165-199.
  • Schmidt, F. L., y Rader, M. (1999). Exploring the boundary conditions for interview validity: Meta-analytic validity findings for a new interview type. Personnel Psychology, 29, 79-101.
  • Schmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interviews decisions: Implications for the employment interview. Personnel Psychology,29, 79-101.
  • Schmitt, N., y Ostroff, C. (1986). Operationalizing the «behavioral consistency» approach: Selection test development based on a content-oriented strategy. Personnel Psychology, 39, 91-108.
  • Schüler, H., y Funke, U. (1989). The interview as a multimodal procedure. En Eder, E.W. y Ferris G. R. (Eds.). The employment interview: Theory, research and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • SIOP (2003). Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Documento pdf., www.siop.org
  • Taylor, P. J., y Small, B. (2002). Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta-analytic comparison of situational and past behaviour employment interview questions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,75, 277-294.
  • Urlich, L., y Trumbo, D. (1965). The selection interview since 1949. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 100-116.
  • Wagner, R. (1949). The employment interview: A critical review. Personnel Psychology, 2, 17-46.
  • Wiesner, W. H., y Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). The moderating impact of interview format and degree of structure on interview validity. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275-290.
  • Wright, O. R. Jr. (1969). Summary of research on the selection interview since 1964. Personnel Psychology, 22, 391-413.
  • Wright, P. M., Lichtenfels, P. A. y Pursell, E.D (1989). The structured interview: Additional studies and meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 62, 191-199.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet